Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 707, H.Res. 313 is amended.
This resolution sets the House's rules for taking up the Senate amendment to the concurrent budget resolution for fiscal year 2025. It allows the House to take the amended budget resolution from the Speaker's table and consider a motion to concur without being subject to any points of order. The motion is considered read, is limited to one hour of debate split evenly between the Budget Committee chair and ranking minority member, and the previous question is ordered to allow a final vote without further amendments. The resolution also pauses the calendar-day count for a specific presidentially declared national emergency for the period April 9 through September 30, 2025, for purposes of a joint resolution that would terminate that emergency.
This is a House rules (simple) resolution that only governs House procedure and does not become law. It fast-tracks consideration by providing one hour of equally divided debate, barring points of order, and ordering the previous question to move quickly to a final vote.
This House resolution establishes rules to consider the Senate amendment to H.
Con.
Res. 14 (the FY2025 congressional budget), allowing a motion to concur, considered as read, with one hour of debate equally divided and no points of order.
The resolution is likely adoptable in the House but is not a public law; the statutory-counting clause cannot by itself change federal law without both chambers and the President.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a well-specified procedural/agenda-setting measure. It clearly establishes the specific floor procedure for considering a Senate amendment to the congressional budget concurrent resolution and separately provides a narrowly tailored, time‑bound exclusion of calendar days for purposes of the National Emergencies Act.
Whether excluding days under the NEA improperly delays congressional oversight
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Whether excluding days under the NEA improperly delays congressional oversight
Views the rule as a procedural maneuver that limits scrutiny of both the budget and a specific national emergency termination.
Concerned that excluding days under the National Emergencies Act delays Congress's ability to terminate an emergency and reduces accountability.
Sees the resolution as pragmatic for moving a budget measure efficiently but worries about the carve‑out for the National Emergencies Act.
Balances value of orderly floor procedure against congressional oversight obligations.
Likely supportive because it streamlines House action on the budget and preserves the President's national emergency authorities by pausing the NEA termination clock.
Views as responsible governance and defense of executive tools.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
The resolution is likely adoptable in the House but is not a public law; the statutory-counting clause cannot by itself change federal law without both chambers and the President.
The House formally adopted this resolution. A resolution applies only to the House and does not require the other chamber's approval or the President's signature — this vote settles the matter.
A resolution is a formal statement of opinion or decision by the chamber.
Debate was cut short. The House will proceed directly to a vote on the underlying question.
In the House, this ends debate and forces an immediate vote on the main question.
Whether excluding days under the NEA improperly delays congressional oversight
The resolution is likely adoptable in the House but is not a public law; the statutory-counting clause cannot by itself change federal law…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a well-specified procedural/agenda-setting measure. It clearly establishes the specific floor procedure for considering a Senate amendment to the congression…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.