Pursuant to the provisions of H.Res. 707, H.Res. 313 is amended.
This House resolution establishes rules to consider the Senate amendment to H.
Con.
Res. 14 (the FY2025 congressional budget), allowing a motion to concur, considered as read, with one hour of debate equally divided and no points of order.
The resolution is likely adoptable in the House but is not a public law; the statutory-counting clause cannot by itself change federal law without both chambers and the President.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a well-specified procedural/agenda-setting measure. It clearly establishes the specific floor procedure for considering a Senate amendment to the congressional budget concurrent resolution and separately provides a narrowly tailored, time‑bound exclusion of calendar days for purposes of the National Emergencies Act.
Whether excluding days under the NEA improperly delays congressional oversight
Whether excluding days under the NEA improperly delays congressional oversight
Views the rule as a procedural maneuver that limits scrutiny of both the budget and a specific national emergency termination.
Concerned that excluding days under the National Emergencies Act delays Congress's ability to terminate an emergency and reduces accountability.
Sees the resolution as pragmatic for moving a budget measure efficiently but worries about the carve‑out for the National Emergencies Act.
Balances value of orderly floor procedure against congressional oversight obligations.
Likely supportive because it streamlines House action on the budget and preserves the President's national emergency authorities by pausing the NEA termination clock.
Views as responsible governance and defense of executive tools.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
The resolution is likely adoptable in the House but is not a public law; the statutory-counting clause cannot by itself change federal law without both chambers and the President.
On Agreeing to the Resolution
On Ordering the Previous Question
Whether excluding days under the NEA improperly delays congressional oversight
The resolution is likely adoptable in the House but is not a public law; the statutory-counting clause cannot by itself change federal law…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a well-specified procedural/agenda-setting measure. It clearly establishes the specific floor procedure for considering a Senate amendment to the congression…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.