H. Res. 332 (119th)Bill Overview

Supporting the designation of the week of April 11 through April 17, 2025, as the eighth annual "Black Maternal Health Week", founded by Black Mamas Matter Alliance, Inc. (BMMA), to bring national attention to the maternal and reproductive health crisis in the United States and the importance of reducing maternal mortality and morbidity among Black women and birthing people.

Simple ResolutionHealth|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 14, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the House of Representatives' support for designating April 11–17, 2025, as Black Maternal Health Week to raise awareness about high rates of maternal death and illness among Black women and birthing people. It is non-binding and does not create law or require government action; it simply states the House's view and priorities. The resolution highlights problems, encourages attention and investment, and urges Congress to support policies and community-led solutions.

This House resolution designates April 11–17, 2025, as the eighth annual Black Maternal Health Week to raise awareness of maternal mortality and morbidity affecting Black women and birthing people.

The resolution recounts CDC statistics, attributes disparities to structural racism and social determinants, endorses community-led solutions, and calls for policies including extended postpartum coverage, investments in Black-led maternal care, and passage of the Black Maternal Health Momnibus Act.

Passage40/100

High chance to pass the House as a symbolic resolution; lower chance for broader adoption or Senate action because of ideological language.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly defines the issue being memorialized, provides abundant supporting findings, and specifies the designation and aims of the observance. It appropriately refrains from creating binding legal mechanisms or funding obligations.

Contention65/100

Symbolic designation broadly accepted; policy implications contested

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Communities · Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitElevates public and policymaker awareness of Black maternal health disparities nationwide.
  • CommunitiesCould create political momentum toward funding community‑based maternal health programs and research.
  • Federal agenciesSignals federal support for expanded postpartum coverage and continuity of care for at least one year.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAs a resolution, it is largely symbolic and does not create binding programs or funding.
  • Federal agenciesMay lead to proposals that increase federal spending or mandates, raising cost and budget concerns.
  • Potential burdenSome stakeholders may object to race‑specific policy focus or disagree on proposed remedies.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Symbolic designation broadly accepted; policy implications contested
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive.

The resolution highlights systemic racism, reproductive justice, and investments in community-based maternal care aligned with progressive priorities.

Its endorsement of extended postpartum coverage and the Momnibus Act fits mainstream progressive policy goals.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally supportive but cautious.

The centrist persona appreciates attention to documented disparities and preventive focus, while seeking clarity on costs, implementation, and measurable outcomes.

They view the resolution as a useful awareness tool that should be paired with fiscally responsible legislation.

Leans supportive
Conservative25%

Likely skeptical or somewhat opposed.

While sympathetic to reducing maternal deaths, this persona may object to the resolution's framing of systemic causes, its critique of the Roe overturn, and calls for expanded federal roles and decriminalization.

They may view the measure as largely symbolic and potentially a vehicle for progressive policy priorities.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

High chance to pass the House as a symbolic resolution; lower chance for broader adoption or Senate action because of ideological language.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House leadership will schedule it for a vote
  • Potential objections to references to Roe v. Wade
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Symbolic designation broadly accepted; policy implications contested

High chance to pass the House as a symbolic resolution; lower chance for broader adoption or Senate action because of ideological language.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly defines the issue being memorialized, provides abundant supporting findings, and specifies the designation…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis