H. Res. 340 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the significance of "Community College Month" in April 2025 as a celebration of the more than 1,000 community colleges throughout the United States that support access to higher education, workforce training, and more, and broadly sustain and advance the economic prosperity of the United States.

Simple ResolutionEducation|Education
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Apr 21, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is the House expressing recognition of Community College Month in April 2025 and highlighting the role of community colleges. It does not create binding law, allocate funding, or require action by the President or other bodies. It is a formal, nonbinding statement from the House to honor and call attention to community colleges.

Passage rules

This simple resolution is considered only by the House of Representatives and does not go to the Senate or the President. It is nonbinding and does not have the force of law.

This House resolution designates April 2025 as "Community College Month," recognizing over 1,000 U.S. community colleges and their roles in access, workforce training, and economic contribution.

The resolution cites facts about community college enrollment, affordability, dual enrollment, and estimated economic returns but does not authorize spending or change law.

It is a nonbinding, symbolic statement of recognition by the House of Representatives.

Passage1/100

As a House simple resolution it is ceremonial and does not become law; near-zero chance of becoming statute absent separate legislation.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that effectively states its purpose and supplies supporting facts; it requires minimal implementation and appropriately omits fiscal, legal, and oversight scaffolding.

Contention10/100

Liberty/left wants follow-up funding; conservatives prefer symbolic recognition only

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
CommunitiesStudents

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • CommunitiesRaises public awareness of community colleges, potentially increasing applications and enrollments modestly.
  • CommunitiesHighlights community colleges' role in workforce training, supporting employer education partnerships.
  • Potential benefitUnderscores affordability and access, which supporters could use to argue for sustained investment.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs purely symbolic and does not provide funding or change law or regulations.
  • Potential burdenMay draw attention away from substantive policy debates about college financing and quality.
  • StudentsDoes not address structural equity gaps, completion rates, or long‑term student outcomes.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberty/left wants follow-up funding; conservatives prefer symbolic recognition only
Progressive90%

Likely strongly supportive because it highlights access, affordability, and workforce pathways for nontraditional students.

Views the resolution as a morale-boosting acknowledgement, but insufficient without additional investments or equity provisions.

Leans supportive
Centrist95%

Generally supportive and sees the resolution as a low-cost, bipartisan recognition of practical workforce and educational institutions.

Appreciates the local economic focus while noting the measure is ceremonial and should not create unfunded mandates.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Likely broadly supportive because it emphasizes workforce training, economic benefits, and local access.

Prefers the resolution's symbolic nature rather than new federal spending or mandates, and may caution against politicizing curricula.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood1/100

As a House simple resolution it is ceremonial and does not become law; near-zero chance of becoming statute absent separate legislation.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a Senate companion resolution will be introduced
  • Whether House leadership will schedule floor consideration
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberty/left wants follow-up funding; conservatives prefer symbolic recognition only

As a House simple resolution it is ceremonial and does not become law; near-zero chance of becoming statute absent separate legislation.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that effectively states its purpose and supplies supporting facts; it requires minimal implementation and appropri…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis