H. Res. 347 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the significant impact and legacy of Cecil Corbin-Mark in the environmental justice community and further recognizing that climate change most severely impacts vulnerable and disadvantaged communities in the United States and around the world, and that it is the responsibility of the United States Government to work with its global partners to promote environmental justice.

Simple ResolutionEnvironmental Protection|Environmental Protection
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a House simple resolution that formally recognizes Cecil Corbin-Mark's contributions and expresses the House's views on climate and environmental justice. It urges the U.S. Government to work with global partners and prioritize protections for vulnerable communities, but it does not create binding law or require agencies to act. Only the House can adopt this type of resolution; it does not become law or require Presidential approval. It functions as an official statement of opinion and policy preference from the House.

Passage rules

This is a House-only simple resolution; it does not go to the Senate or the President and is non-binding.

This House resolution honors Cecil Corbin-Mark’s contributions to environmental justice and recognizes that climate change disproportionately harms vulnerable and disadvantaged communities globally.

It urges U.S. leadership and international cooperation on climate adaptation, inclusive stakeholder engagement, protections for frontline communities, and immediate multilateral action to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.

The measure is a nonbinding statement of congressional views and priorities.

Passage10/100

As a simple House resolution expressing views, it is unlikely to become law; passage in the House is plausible but not legally binding.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a conventional commemorative/expressive House resolution: it provides a detailed factual and normative record recognizing Cecil Corbin-Mark and highlighting climate justice concerns, and it issues nonbinding urges to the U.S. Government and international partners without creating legal obligations, funding authorities, or implementation requirements.

Contention62/100

Left sees strong symbolic and justice value; right worries about policy implications.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises congressional and public awareness of environmental justice and Cecil Corbin-Mark's contributions.
  • Potential benefitSignals U.S. commitment to international climate adaptation, potentially facilitating diplomatic cooperation.
  • Potential benefitEncourages agencies and lawmakers to prioritize frontline communities in climate policy and grantmaking.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenNon-binding language creates symbolic recognition without direct legal, regulatory, or budgetary effects.
  • Federal agenciesMay raise stakeholder expectations for future federal spending or policy changes not yet specified.
  • Federal agenciesCould be cited to advocate for federal mandates that shift regulatory burdens onto states or industry.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left sees strong symbolic and justice value; right worries about policy implications.
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive: it affirms climate justice principles and elevates environmental justice leadership.

Sees the resolution as an important symbolic step toward centering frontline communities, though it does not itself create funding or mandates (speculative impact).

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally supportive but cautious: the nonbinding resolution aligns with pragmatic goals like adaptation and cooperation, yet lacks specifics on implementation, costs, or measurable outcomes.

Views it as constructive diplomatic messaging if paired with clear plans.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Skeptical overall: while praising an individual is unobjectionable, urging U.S. leadership to 'drastically reduce emissions' and emphasizing global cooperative approaches raises concerns about implied regulatory or international obligations.

Support is limited given lack of safeguards for economic impacts (some impacts speculative).

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood10/100

As a simple House resolution expressing views, it is unlikely to become law; passage in the House is plausible but not legally binding.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House leadership schedules the resolution for floor consideration
  • Committee attention or blocking amendments
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left sees strong symbolic and justice value; right worries about policy implications.

As a simple House resolution expressing views, it is unlikely to become law; passage in the House is plausible but not legally binding.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a conventional commemorative/expressive House resolution: it provides a detailed factual and normative record recognizing Cecil Corbin-Mark and highlight…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis