H. Res. 355 (119th)Bill Overview

Supporting the designation of the week of April 28 through May 2, 2025, as "National Specialized Instructional Support Personnel Appreciation Week".

Simple ResolutionEducation|Education
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Apr 28, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Education and Workforce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a non-binding statement from the House of Representatives that designates April 28 through May 2, 2025 as National Specialized Instructional Support Personnel Appreciation Week. It expresses support, recognizes the role of these school professionals, and encourages policymakers and experts to raise awareness and share best practices. It does not create legal rights, change funding, or require action by state or federal agencies.

Passage rules

This is a House simple resolution acted on only by the House; it is not sent to the President and does not have the force of law. It is purely a formal expression of the House and does not alter statutes or appropriations.

This House resolution designates April 28–May 2, 2025, as National Specialized Instructional Support Personnel Appreciation Week.

It recognizes more than 1,000,000 school-based specialized instructional support personnel (counselors, social workers, psychologists, nurses, therapists, speech-language pathologists, audiologists, and similar professionals), commends their work, and encourages policymakers and experts to raise awareness, share best practices, and acknowledge their roles in student mental health, safety, and learning.

The resolution is non-binding and contains no funding provisions.

Passage0/100

As a House simple resolution (symbolic), it is not a statute and cannot become law; adoption confined to House action.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly establishes a specific appreciation week, identifies the relevant personnel categories, and issues nonbinding recognitions and encouragements but contains no binding mechanisms, funding provisions, or implementation requirements.

Contention18/100

Progressive wants concrete funding and staffing commitments following recognition

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Schools · Local governmentsLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness about the roles and services of specialized instructional support personnel.
  • SchoolsMay boost morale and professional recognition for school-based support staff.
  • Local governmentsCould encourage local policymakers and districts to prioritize related programs or staffing.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs purely symbolic and does not provide funding or create enforceable policy changes.
  • Potential burdenDoes not address substantive workforce shortages, compensation, or caseload reductions.
  • Potential burdenMay create expectations for action that are unmet without follow‑up funding or legislation.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive wants concrete funding and staffing commitments following recognition
Progressive85%

Generally supportive of the recognition and the emphasis on mental health and equity in schools.

Likely to welcome the spotlight on multidisciplinary teams but note the absence of new funding or staffing mandates.

May press for follow-up policy and resources to translate recognition into measurable improvements.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Likely to view the resolution as a low-cost, bipartisan acknowledgement of important school roles.

Appreciates the encouragement of evidence-based practices and coordination among government layers, while noting the resolution's symbolic nature and lack of concrete policy or budgetary detail.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Generally supportive of honoring school staff who contribute to safety and student well-being, but cautious about any implication of expanded federal mandates.

Likely to prefer state and local control and to insist this remain a symbolic recognition without binding obligations or curricular influence.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a House simple resolution (symbolic), it is not a statute and cannot become law; adoption confined to House action.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will schedule floor consideration promptly
  • Sponsor and leadership support level not shown in text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive wants concrete funding and staffing commitments following recognition

As a House simple resolution (symbolic), it is not a statute and cannot become law; adoption confined to House action.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution: it clearly establishes a specific appreciation week, identifies the relevant personnel categories, and issues nonbindin…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis