H. Res. 360 (119th)Bill Overview

Expressing support for the designation of the last Tuesday of April each year as "APOL1-Mediated Kidney Disease (AMKD) Awareness Day".

Simple ResolutionHealth|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 29, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a nonbinding House statement that supports designating the last Tuesday of April each year as APOL1-Mediated Kidney Disease (AMKD) Awareness Day. It does not create law, change federal programs, or require action by agencies; it simply expresses the House of Representatives view and encourages public awareness. The text urges people, especially those with ancestry from Western or Central Africa, to learn about APOL1-related risks and consider genetic testing and preventive care.

This House resolution expresses support for designating the last Tuesday of April each year as APOL1–Mediated Kidney Disease (AMKD) Awareness Day.

It highlights kidney disease prevalence, racial disparities affecting Black Americans, the role of APOL1 genetic variants, and encourages awareness, research, preventive care, and that people with Western or Central African ancestry consider APOL1 genetic testing.

Passage0/100

As a House simple resolution expressing support, it does not create binding law and cannot become statutory law; symbolic passage in the House is likely, not legal enactment.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured commemorative resolution: it clearly states the problem and purpose, specifies the day to be recognized, and uses standard 'Whereas' findings to justify the designation. It remains a symbolic expression without binding legal effect.

Contention30/100

Liberals want equity, funding, and anti-discrimination safeguards

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
WorkersLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public and clinical awareness about APOL1 risk and related kidney disparities.
  • WorkersMay increase demand for genetic testing and diagnostic laboratory services.
  • Potential benefitCould boost recruitment for clinical trials and APOL1‑focused research efforts.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenEncouraging genetic testing raises concerns about privacy and potential misuse of genetic data.
  • Potential burdenTesting recommendations could increase out‑of‑pocket costs for individuals without coverage.
  • Potential burdenMay contribute to stigmatization or profiling of people with Western or Central African ancestry.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals want equity, funding, and anti-discrimination safeguards
Progressive85%

Generally supportive of raising awareness about a health disparity that disproportionately affects Black Americans.

Sees potential to promote research, prevention, and equitable care, while wanting safeguards around testing access and discrimination protections.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Supportive of a symbolic resolution raising awareness, but wants clarity on evidence, clinical utility, costs, and protections.

Sees value in promoting research while seeking practical safeguards and measurable outcomes.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

Mixed but leans mildly supportive of an awareness day; supports public health awareness but wary about promoting race-targeted genetic testing and government involvement in medical choices.

Prefers private medical decision-making and safeguards against misuse.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

As a House simple resolution expressing support, it does not create binding law and cannot become statutory law; symbolic passage in the House is likely, not legal enactment.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House passage is sought only as a symbolic action
  • Possible privacy or discrimination concerns about genetic testing
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals want equity, funding, and anti-discrimination safeguards

As a House simple resolution expressing support, it does not create binding law and cannot become statutory law; symbolic passage in the Ho…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-structured commemorative resolution: it clearly states the problem and purpose, specifies the day to be recognized, and uses standard 'Whereas' findings to…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis