Sponsor introductory remarks on measure. (CR H1926)
This resolution is a non-binding statement by the House that supports designating May 9 through May 18, 2025, as "National American Birding Week" and encourages participation in birding events. It expresses the House's views on bird migration, conservation, and the economic benefits of birding but does not create new legal rights or obligations. It does not require the Senate or the President to act and does not change federal law.
Simple resolutions are considered and voted on only in the House of Representatives and are not presented to the Senate or the President. They do not have the force of law and do not create binding federal obligations.
This House resolution expresses support for designating May 9–18, 2025, as "National American Birding Week." It recognizes migratory bird population declines, notes birding's economic impact, praises coordinated conservation efforts, and encourages public participation in birding events such as the Biggest Week in American Birding.
The resolution is symbolic and does not appropriate funds or create legal obligations.
As a House resolution it is nonbinding and not a lawmaking vehicle; adoption by the House is likely but statutory enactment is unlikely.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative House resolution: it states a designation, contextualizes with supportive facts, and encourages public engagement. Its limited substantive mechanics, absence of fiscal provisions, and lack of statutory amendments are consistent with a symbolic measure.
Progressive: wants funding and stronger protections alongside the designation
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressive: wants funding and stronger protections alongside the designation
Generally supportive: welcomes conservation awareness, public engagement, and recognition of threats to migratory birds.
Likely to view the resolution as positive but insufficient without funding or stronger protective measures.
Supportive but pragmatic: views the resolution as a low-cost, bipartisan recognition that promotes tourism and conservation.
Would prefer follow-up actions with measurable outcomes and minimal federal cost.
Likely mildly supportive as symbolic recognition of outdoor recreation and tourism, but cautious about federal role.
Some conservatives may see it as unnecessary use of floor time.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a House resolution it is nonbinding and not a lawmaking vehicle; adoption by the House is likely but statutory enactment is unlikely.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressive: wants funding and stronger protections alongside the designation
As a House resolution it is nonbinding and not a lawmaking vehicle; adoption by the House is likely but statutory enactment is unlikely.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative House resolution: it states a designation, contextualizes with supportive facts, and encourages public engagement. Its li…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.