H. Res. 364 (119th)Bill Overview

Calling upon local communities to support organizations that provide resources and aid Gold Shield Families in their time of need.

Simple ResolutionEmergency Management|Community life and organizationEmergency Management
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
Apr 30, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the House's call for local communities to support nonprofits that help Gold Shield Families after line-of-duty deaths of first responders. It encourages communities to back those organizations and asks families to use the available resources. It does not create new rights, funding, or legal requirements. It is a nonbinding statement of support.

Passage rules

This is a simple resolution acted on by the House of Representatives only and does not go to the Senate or the President. It is nonbinding and does not enact law or authorize spending.

This House resolution urges local communities to support nonprofits that provide resources and aid to families of first responders who died in the line of duty, referred to as "Gold Shield Families." It recognizes the sacrifices of first responders and encourages those families to use available nonprofit resources.

The resolution is hortatory and does not appropriate funds or create new federal programs.

Passage5/100

As a House simple resolution it is declarative and not a statutory law; symbolic passage in the House is likely, but it does not become law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a conventional commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose and whom it intends to honor/encourage but provides little operational, fiscal, or legal detail, which is typical and generally appropriate for this type of instrument.

Contention12/100

Liberals want structural survivor benefits; conservatives accept symbolic support.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · CommunitiesFederal agencies · Local governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Local governmentsMay increase local donations and funding to nonprofits serving families of fallen first responders.
  • Potential benefitCould enhance emotional, social, and practical support available to bereaved Gold Shield Families.
  • CommunitiesRaises public awareness of first responders’ sacrifices and community obligations to their families.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesResolution is nonbinding and creates no federal funding, mandates, or enforceable obligations.
  • Local governmentsSupport likely to vary by locality, producing uneven assistance across regions and populations.
  • Potential burdenMay divert attention from legislative policy changes or benefit programs addressing first responder needs.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals want structural survivor benefits; conservatives accept symbolic support.
Progressive85%

Generally supportive of honoring fallen first responders and assisting their families, but cautious that the resolution is symbolic and lacks structural support.

Would prefer stronger commitments to survivor benefits, mental-health services, and equitable access nationwide.

Supports nonprofits but wants attention to systemic assistance gaps.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Likely supportive because it is a nonbinding, respectful recognition encouraging local action.

Views the resolution as low-cost and symbolic but wants clarity that it imposes no federal mandates or spending.

Would endorse while seeking follow-up on practical supports.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Strongly supportive of honoring first responders and empowering local communities and nonprofits.

Appreciates the nonbinding, local approach and lack of federal spending.

Cautious about politicizing the issue or expanding federal authority over local support networks.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Reached or meaningfully advanced

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

As a House simple resolution it is declarative and not a statutory law; symbolic passage in the House is likely, but it does not become law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a companion Senate resolution will be introduced
  • House floor scheduling or bundling with other measures
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals want structural survivor benefits; conservatives accept symbolic support.

As a House simple resolution it is declarative and not a statutory law; symbolic passage in the House is likely, but it does not become law.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a conventional commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose and whom it intends to honor/encourage but provides little operational, fiscal, or…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis