H. Res. 376 (119th)Bill Overview

Expressing support for the designation of May 4, 2025, as a "National Day of Reason" and recognizing the central importance of reason in the betterment of humanity.

Simple ResolutionGovernment Operations and Politics|Government Operations and Politics
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
May 1, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the House of Representatives' support for designating May 4, 2025 as a "National Day of Reason" and recognizes the role of reason in advancing society. It encourages people to observe the day and to value critical thinking, the scientific method, and free inquiry. Because this is a simple House resolution, it does not create a law, does not require the President's signature, and does not have force beyond the House's official statement of opinion. It is a nonbinding, symbolic action meant to communicate the House's stance and encourage public observance.

This House resolution expresses support for designating May 4, 2025, as a “National Day of Reason.” It recognizes reason, critical thought, the scientific method, and free inquiry as central to progress, the rule of law, separation of church and state, civil liberties, resisting disinformation, and confronting climate change.

The resolution cites Founders’ statements on knowledge and urges Americans to observe and uplift reason.

It is a symbolic, nonbinding expression of the House.

Passage5/100

H. Res. is declaratory and chamber-specific; it does not create binding law, so becoming statute is unlikely.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that names a specific date, supplies rationale rooted in historical and constitutional references, and encourages public observance without creating legal obligations or altering statute.

Contention65/100

Liberals emphasize science, secular governance, and climate linkage

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
StatesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitSymbolically affirms evidence-based decision-making and the role of science in public life.
  • Potential benefitEncourages public awareness and critical thinking education through observance and civic activities.
  • StatesReinforces secularity by highlighting separation of church and state and rights for religious and nonreligious persons.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenMay be perceived by some religious communities as hostile or dismissive towards faith traditions.
  • Potential burdenCould deepen cultural polarization by framing rationalism against religious belief.
  • Potential burdenIs purely symbolic and imposes no funding, regulatory, or remedial actions.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize science, secular governance, and climate linkage
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive because the resolution affirms science, secular governance, civil liberties, and climate action.

It aligns with progressive priorities of evidence-based policy and combating disinformation.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally supportive but cautious: the resolution is symbolic and low-cost, yet could be unnecessary or divisive.

Prefers inclusive framing and clarity that it is nonbinding and voluntary.

Leans supportive
Conservative25%

Likely skeptical or opposed because the resolution foregrounds secularism and may be interpreted as antagonistic to religion.

Sees potential conflict with faith-based traditions like a National Day of Prayer.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

H. Res. is declaratory and chamber-specific; it does not create binding law, so becoming statute is unlikely.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether House will schedule the resolution for a floor vote
  • Potential organized opposition from religious or faith-based groups
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize science, secular governance, and climate linkage

H. Res. is declaratory and chamber-specific; it does not create binding law, so becoming statute is unlikely.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that names a specific date, supplies rationale rooted in historical and constitutional references, and encourages…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis