H. Res. 389 (119th)Bill Overview

Supporting the goals and ideals of National Nurses Week, to be observed from May 6 through May 12, 2025.

Simple ResolutionHealth|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
May 6, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a simple, non-binding statement by the House of Representatives that supports National Nurses Week and recognizes nurses' contributions. It does not create law, change federal funding, or require action by the executive branch. The resolution encourages people to observe the week with ceremonies and programs. It expresses the House's view but does not have legal force beyond that chamber.

Passage rules

Simple resolutions are adopted by only one chamber and do not go to the President, so they do not have the force of law. This resolution was introduced in the House and, if adopted, would express the House's position but not create legal obligations.

This House resolution expresses support for the goals and ideals of National Nurses Week, to be observed May 6–12, 2025.

It acknowledges nurses' contributions to health care, public health, research, and patient advocacy, and highlights workforce development needs.

The resolution encourages public recognition and ceremonies and notes needs such as strengthening nursing workforce development and doctoral faculty.

Passage0/100

This is a simple House resolution with no force of law; adoption does not create binding legal obligations.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states purpose and justification and uses the expected, limited mechanisms (recognition and encouragement) without attempting to create legal obligations, funding, or administrative changes.

Contention12/100

Progressive demands concrete funding and staffing reforms.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
CommunitiesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • CommunitiesRaises public awareness of nursing contributions, increasing community recognition and visibility.
  • Potential benefitMay boost nurse morale through formal recognition, ceremonies, and public appreciation.
  • Potential benefitCould catalyze advocacy for expanded nursing education and workforce development programs.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenResolution is symbolic and does not allocate funding or mandate policy changes.
  • Potential burdenMay create public or professional expectations for action without concrete legislative steps.
  • Potential burdenCould be characterized as performative, diverting attention from substantive workforce solutions.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressive demands concrete funding and staffing reforms.
Progressive90%

Generally welcomes the recognition of nurses and the explicit mention of workforce development and nursing research.

Views the resolution as a positive symbolic step but insufficient without concrete funding, staffing standards, and investments in nursing education.

Likely to use the resolution as a platform to push for follow-on legislation addressing staffing ratios, retention, and education pipeline support.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Views the resolution as an appropriate, bipartisan recognition of an essential profession and public health contributor.

Appreciates emphasis on workforce development but notes the resolution is non-binding and symbolic.

Wants measurable, fiscally responsible follow-up actions rather than grandstanding.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Likely to back the resolution as a noncontroversial recognition of nurses' service and public-health role.

Prefers that this remain a ceremonial, non-binding statement and resists any implied endorsement of federal mandates or large spending increases.

Will watch for follow-up proposals that expand federal control or funding.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

This is a simple House resolution with no force of law; adoption does not create binding legal obligations.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will schedule floor consideration promptly
  • Potential minor objections to specific wording in committee
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressive demands concrete funding and staffing reforms.

This is a simple House resolution with no force of law; adoption does not create binding legal obligations.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states purpose and justification and uses the expected, limited mechanisms (recognition and encouragement)…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis