H. Res. 397 (119th)Bill Overview

Supporting the designation of May 8, 2025, as "National Scam Survivor Day".

Simple ResolutionCommerce|Commerce
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Republican
Introduced
May 7, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the House of Representatives support for designating May 8, 2025 as National Scam Survivor Day and urges increased public awareness, survivor support, and improved prevention and enforcement efforts. It is a non-binding statement from the House and does not create a law, change legal rights, or provide funding. The resolution encourages federal, state, local, private, and nonprofit cooperation and use of government resources to prevent scams and help victims.

Passage rules

This simple House resolution is considered and voted on only in the House of Representatives; it does not go to the President, does not become law, and is non-binding.

This non‑binding House resolution designates May 8, 2025, as "National Scam Survivor Day," cites 2024 scam statistics and trends, and encourages public awareness, use of federal resources, survivor storytelling, interagency and public‑private collaboration, improved prevention toolkits, and law enforcement efforts against scams.

Passage2/100

As a House simple resolution, it is a nonbinding expression unlikely to become statute; adoption in the House is probable but it does not create law.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a straightforward commemorative instrument with a clear problem statement and broadly phrased encouragements. It does not create legal obligations, modify statutory authorities, or establish programs.

Contention18/100

Emphasis on federal funding and regulation versus enforcement and limited government

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Consumers · Federal agenciesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • ConsumersIncreases public awareness of scams, potentially reducing victimization if awareness changes consumer behavior.
  • Federal agenciesEncourages reporting to Federal resources, possibly improving detection and law enforcement responses.
  • Potential benefitReduces stigma by urging survivors to tell their stories, potentially increasing help-seeking and support.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenSymbolic designation provides no funding, legal authority, or direct enforcement changes.
  • Potential burdenLacks measurable targets or accountability, limiting ability to assess effectiveness.
  • Potential burdenEncouraging public storytelling could risk survivors' privacy or emotional harm without safeguards.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Emphasis on federal funding and regulation versus enforcement and limited government
Progressive95%

Likely supportive.

Views the designation as helpful for raising awareness about targeted populations and promoting prevention resources.

Would press for concrete funding, stronger consumer protections, and outreach to marginalized groups.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Generally supportive as a low‑cost, bipartisan awareness measure.

Sees value in data and coordination but wants measurable outcomes and clarity on responsibilities to avoid duplication or unfunded mandates.

Leans supportive
Conservative75%

Likely supportive of the anti‑fraud and law‑enforcement elements, but cautious about expanding federal programs.

Prefers enforcement, private sector solutions, and avoiding new federal spending or regulatory overreach.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood2/100

As a House simple resolution, it is a nonbinding expression unlikely to become statute; adoption in the House is probable but it does not create law.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether a companion Senate resolution will be introduced
  • Level of cosponsorship and floor scheduling in the House
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Emphasis on federal funding and regulation versus enforcement and limited government

As a House simple resolution, it is a nonbinding expression unlikely to become statute; adoption in the House is probable but it does not c…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a straightforward commemorative instrument with a clear problem statement and broadly phrased encouragements. It does not create legal obligations, modify st…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis