H. Res. 404 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing and celebrating "National Salvation Army Week" on May 12 through May 18, 2025.

Simple ResolutionGovernment Operations and Politics|Government Operations and Politics
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
May 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a non-binding House statement that recognizes and celebrates National Salvation Army Week and commends the Salvation Army’s work. It expresses the House of Representatives' support and encourages Americans to participate in acts of service and generosity. Because it is a simple resolution, it does not create law, does not change federal programs, and is not sent to the President. Its effect is purely symbolic and declaratory.

Passage rules

This simple House resolution only requires passage by the House of Representatives; it does not require Senate approval or the President's signature and has no force of law.

This House resolution designates May 12–18, 2025, as National Salvation Army Week, commends the Salvation Army’s historic and ongoing social services, and encourages Americans to engage in service and support the organization.

It is a nonbinding, symbolic recognition that highlights the Salvation Army’s disaster relief, food assistance, shelters, rehabilitation, and volunteer efforts.

Passage1/100

As a House resolution of recognition, it is nonbinding and not a vehicle to become law; near-zero legal enactment probability.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a conventional commemorative House resolution: it clearly states and justifies the recognition, sets dates for observance, and offers commendation and encouragement without creating legal obligations or fiscal commitments.

Contention30/100

Progressives emphasize civil‑rights concerns and nondiscrimination enforcement

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsStates

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitMay increase public awareness of Salvation Army programs and services.
  • Potential benefitCould boost donations and volunteer sign-ups for the organization during and after the week.
  • Local governmentsMight strengthen coordination with local, state, and federal emergency response partners.
Likely burdened
  • StatesMay raise church-state concerns because the Salvation Army is a religious organization.
  • Potential burdenCould be interpreted as government preference for one nonprofit over others providing similar services.
  • Potential burdenSome individuals may feel alienated by the organization's prior policy positions on gender and sexuality.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize civil‑rights concerns and nondiscrimination enforcement
Progressive65%

Generally supportive of recognizing charitable relief work, but cautious about endorsing faith‑based providers without clear nondiscrimination protections.

Likely to welcome attention to homelessness, hunger, and addiction services while noting potential gaps on civil‑rights issues.

Split reaction
Centrist80%

Views the resolution as a routine, bipartisan acknowledgment of a long‑standing nonprofit that provides community services.

Supportive but wants clarity that this is symbolic, not a funding or policy change.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Strongly favorable: sees recognition of a faith‑based charity as appropriate and deserving.

Values private charity and volunteerism as complements to limited government.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood1/100

As a House resolution of recognition, it is nonbinding and not a vehicle to become law; near-zero legal enactment probability.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will schedule floor consideration
  • Any rare objections on church‑state grounds
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize civil‑rights concerns and nondiscrimination enforcement

As a House resolution of recognition, it is nonbinding and not a vehicle to become law; near-zero legal enactment probability.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a conventional commemorative House resolution: it clearly states and justifies the recognition, sets dates for observance, and offers commendation and en…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis