Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.
This resolution impeaches President Donald J. Trump, formally accusing him of high crimes and misdemeanors for conduct the House describes as devolving U.S. democracy into authoritarianism. In practice it is the House's formal charge and directs that an Article of Impeachment be sent to the Senate. Impeachment by the House is an accusation only; removal from office would require a later Senate trial and conviction.
The House adopts articles of impeachment by a simple majority vote; if adopted the articles are transmitted to the Senate for trial. Conviction and removal in the Senate would require a two-thirds vote.
This resolution (H.
Res. 415) impeaches President Donald J.
Trump, alleging he devolved U.S. democracy toward authoritarianism and violated his constitutional duties.
Impeachment articles can pass a House majority but removal requires a large Senate supermajority; partisan, high-controversy content lowers overall chance.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a substantive Article of Impeachment: it presents an extensive problem statement and legal integration appropriate to charging the President, but it provides only minimal procedural and implementation detail beyond directing that the Article be exhibited to the Senate.
Liberal emphasizes protection of courts and due process; conservatives see partisan weaponization.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberal emphasizes protection of courts and due process; conservatives see partisan weaponization.
Likely strongly supportive.
This persona views the resolution as a necessary defense of judicial independence, due process, and democratic norms.
They see impeachment as an appropriate constitutional remedy for alleged executive lawlessness and threats to civil rights.
Cautiously mixed.
This persona recognizes serious legal and institutional questions raised by the cited court findings and alleged flouting of orders, but worries about partisan optics, evidentiary sufficiency, and institutional costs without broad consensus.
Likely strongly opposed.
This persona views the resolution as politicized and an overreach by Congress to remove an elected president for rhetoric and policy execution.
They emphasize executive discretion in immigration enforcement and free speech on judicial criticism.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Impeachment articles can pass a House majority but removal requires a large Senate supermajority; partisan, high-controversy content lowers overall chance.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberal emphasizes protection of courts and due process; conservatives see partisan weaponization.
Impeachment articles can pass a House majority but removal requires a large Senate supermajority; partisan, high-controversy content lowers…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a substantive Article of Impeachment: it presents an extensive problem statement and legal integration appropriate to charging the President, but it prov…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.