H. Res. 446 (119th)Bill Overview

Expressing support for the recognition of July 3 through July 10, 2025, as "National Extreme Heat Awareness Week", a national event educating the public on the dangers of extreme heat and the risks of extreme heat events to public safety, infrastructure, agriculture, and much more, and supporting the goals of a National Extreme Heat Awareness Week.

Simple ResolutionEmergency Management|Emergency Management
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
May 23, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in…

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution expresses the House of Representatives' support for recognizing July 3 through July 10, 2025, as National Extreme Heat Awareness Week and for the week's goals of public education and preparedness. It encourages Americans, public entities, private organizations, and schools to observe the week with appropriate ceremonies and activities and urges continued research and policies to address extreme heat. Because this is a simple House resolution, it does not create law, does not go to the President, and is non-binding.

This House resolution supports recognizing July 3–10, 2025, as National Extreme Heat Awareness Week.

It highlights extreme heat risks to public health, infrastructure, agriculture, and labor, cites heat-related deaths and economic costs, and encourages research, public education, technologies, and improved federal response.

The resolution invites communities, schools, and organizations to observe the week.

Passage0/100

House simple resolutions are non‑binding and do not create law; this text contains no provisions that would become law on passage.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a well-constructed commemorative measure: it clearly defines the issue, specifies the dates and general goals, and uses standard resolution language to invite observance. It does not and reasonably need not include statutory changes, funding, or enforcement mechanisms.

Contention30/100

Degree of acceptable federal response and emergency declarations

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governmentsLocal governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitIncreased public awareness could reduce heat-related illnesses and deaths through better prevention and early responses.
  • Local governmentsEncourages local preparedness programs, emergency planning, and community outreach to protect vulnerable populations.
  • Potential benefitMay stimulate demand for cooling and resilience technologies, potentially supporting jobs in construction and manufactu…
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenThe resolution is symbolic and nonbinding, producing little direct change in law or funding.
  • Local governmentsMay impose modest administrative and communication costs on agencies and local governments.
  • Potential burdenCritics could view it as a symbolic diversion from funding for substantive mitigation projects.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Degree of acceptable federal response and emergency declarations
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive: sees the resolution as an important public-health and climate-adaptation recognition.

Will praise attention to vulnerable populations and research, while noting the text is symbolic and calls for follow-up action and funding.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally supportive but pragmatic: views the resolution as a useful, low-cost awareness tool.

Will welcome attention to public safety and research while seeking clarity on costs, federal role, and measurable follow-through.

Leans supportive
Conservative55%

Cautious approval in principle: may accept awareness efforts for worker safety and public health but is wary of using the resolution to justify expanded federal authority or new spending.

Sees risk in language about national emergencies.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

House simple resolutions are non‑binding and do not create law; this text contains no provisions that would become law on passage.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether committees will prioritize and schedule floor consideration
  • Whether a companion Senate resolution will be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Degree of acceptable federal response and emergency declarations

House simple resolutions are non‑binding and do not create law; this text contains no provisions that would become law on passage.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a well-constructed commemorative measure: it clearly defines the issue, specifies the dates and general goals, and uses standard resolution language to invit…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis