H. Res. 458 (119th)Bill Overview

Rule for H.R. 2483, H.R. 2931, and 2 others

Simple ResolutionCongress|CongressHouse of Representatives
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jun 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution tells the House the specific rules for debating and voting on four named bills, including how long debate will last, which amendments may be offered, and certain procedural waivers. It allows the Speaker to send one bill to the Committee of the Whole and treats specified committee substitute text as already adopted. It also waives many points of order and sets final passage procedures, including allowing one motion to recommit for each bill.

Passage rules

The rule waives many points of order, adopts committee substitute text as adopted, and restricts further amendments to those printed in the Rules Committee report. Debate time is tightly limited (generally one hour for specified bills) and each bill's consideration is governed by the five-minute amendment rule and only one motion to recommit is allowed.

H.

Res. 458 is a House rules resolution that sets the terms for considering four bills: H.R. 2483 (opioid programs reauthorization), H.R. 2931 (SBA office relocations from 'sanctuary' jurisdictions), H.R. 2966 (SBA loan applicants' citizenship documentation), and H.R. 2987 (limits on small business lending companies).

The resolution waives points of order, adopts committee substitutes or a Rules Committee print as the base text, limits amendments to those printed in the Rules Committee report, prescribes debate time, and orders the previous question with one motion to recommit for each bill.

Passage35/100

House consideration is procedurally straightforward, but mixed substantive content and high Senate hurdles make final enactment uncertain.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this House rule resolution is well-constructed: it clearly defines its purpose, integrates with existing House rules, and provides detailed, specific mechanisms and implementation sequencing appropriate to governing floor consideration of multiple bills.

Contention68/100

Progressives highlight civil-rights and access risks from SBA immigration rules

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesLocal governments · Immigrants

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitAccelerates floor consideration and potential passage of the four underlying bills.
  • Potential benefitFacilitates continuation or reauthorization of opioid prevention, treatment, and recovery programs.
  • Federal agenciesEnables relocation of SBA offices from sanctuary jurisdictions, potentially moving federal positions elsewhere.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenWaiving points of order and restricting amendments reduces legislative scrutiny and minority input.
  • Local governmentsRelocating SBA offices could disrupt federal employees and reduce local economic activity in affected areas.
  • ImmigrantsCitizenship documentation requirements may disproportionately exclude immigrant entrepreneurs from some SBA-backed loan…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives highlight civil-rights and access risks from SBA immigration rules
Progressive30%

Likely supportive of the opioid reauthorization but critical of the SBA immigration-focused measures and of the resolution's broad waiver of points of order.

Views the rules-based limitation on amendments and debate as reducing oversight and opportunity to protect civil rights and access to assistance.

Likely resistant
Centrist50%

Mixed view: approves prompt consideration of opioid reauthorization but concerned about bundling and waived procedures.

Wants clearer fiscal, legal, and implementation information before endorsing the SBA-related provisions.

Split reaction
Conservative80%

Generally favorable: supports moving opioid reauthorization and SBA reforms expeditiously, and endorses measures asserting federal standards in 'sanctuary' jurisdictions.

Sees the rules waivers as standard for timely floor action.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Reached or meaningfully advanced

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

House consideration is procedurally straightforward, but mixed substantive content and high Senate hurdles make final enactment uncertain.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • No fiscal/CBO cost estimates included in text
  • Senate receptiveness to immigration-linked SBA mandates
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

HOUSE · Jun 4, 2025
Approve resolution✓ PassedClose voteParty-line

The House formally adopted this resolution. A resolution applies only to the House and does not require the other chamber's approval or the President's signature — this vote settles the matter.

What is a approve resolution?

A resolution is a formal statement of opinion or decision by the chamber.

Yes 51% No 49%
Showing a quick cross-section of legislators, with followed members first when available.
HOUSE · Jun 4, 2025
End debate now✓ PassedClose voteParty-line

Debate was cut short. The House will proceed directly to a vote on the underlying question.

What is a end debate now?

In the House, this ends debate and forces an immediate vote on the main question.

Yes 51% No 49%
Showing a quick cross-section of legislators, with followed members first when available.
06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives highlight civil-rights and access risks from SBA immigration rules

House consideration is procedurally straightforward, but mixed substantive content and high Senate hurdles make final enactment uncertain.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this House rule resolution is well-constructed: it clearly defines its purpose, integrates with existing House rules, and provides detailed, specific mechanisms and implementat…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis