Referred to the House Committee on Rules.
This resolution changes the House rules to exclude certain House office employees who are active-duty military and already hold a Department of Defense security clearance from counting against the limit on the number of staff in an office who may have clearances processed by the Office of House Security. It also limits the clearance level for those employees so it cannot exceed either their DoD clearance or the highest clearance level the office can sponsor. The rule applies only to offices of Members, Delegates, or the Resident Commissioner who serve on certain defense, homeland security, foreign affairs, appropriations, or intelligence committees. This is an internal House procedure change and does not become law outside the House.
This is a House simple resolution that only needs to pass the House of Representatives; it is an internal change to House rules, is not sent to the President, and does not create binding law outside the House.
This resolution amends House Rule XXIX to exclude certain House office employees who are active members of the armed forces and hold Department of Defense (DoD) security clearances from counting against an office's allotment of employees who may hold clearances processed by the Office of House Security.
The employee's clearance for House purposes cannot exceed the lower of their DoD clearance level or the highest clearance the office may sponsor.
The exemption applies only to employees of Members, Delegates, or Resident Commissioners who serve on listed defense, foreign affairs, homeland security, appropriations, or intelligence committees and subcommittees.
Internal, narrowly tailored, low-cost rule amendment with limited controversy and built-in limitations, making House adoption likely absent procedural objections.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused amendment to House Rules (Rule XXIX) that is clear in purpose and reasonably specific in its core mechanics but lacks several implementation and oversight details.
Progressives emphasize transparency and equal access concerns
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize transparency and equal access concerns
Likely cautiously supportive of administrative streamlining for military service members, but worried about transparency and equal treatment across offices.
Concerned about potential bypasses of House-specific security vetting and possible favoritism for certain committees.
Pragmatic approval if the change is administrative and secure; sees efficiency gains for congressional operations.
Wants clear procedural safeguards to ensure security equivalence and minimal political advantage.
Generally supportive as a commonsense accommodation that respects military service and reduces bureaucracy.
Views DoD clearances as robust and appropriate for congressional access when relevant.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Internal, narrowly tailored, low-cost rule amendment with limited controversy and built-in limitations, making House adoption likely absent procedural objections.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize transparency and equal access concerns
Internal, narrowly tailored, low-cost rule amendment with limited controversy and built-in limitations, making House adoption likely absent…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused amendment to House Rules (Rule XXIX) that is clear in purpose and reasonably specific in its core mechanics but lacks several implementation and…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.