Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.
This resolution expresses the House of Representatives' support for naming the second Saturday in June as "Veterans Get Outside Day" and asks federal land and veterans agencies to promote the day. It is a non-binding statement by one chamber of Congress and does not create a legal requirement or authorize spending. It encourages coordination among the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Forest Service, and the Department of the Interior to promote outdoor activities for veterans.
As a simple House resolution, it only needs to pass the House and is not sent to the President. It does not create binding law and does not require Senate approval.
This House resolution expresses support for designating the second Saturday in June as “Veterans Get Outside Day.” It cites elevated rates of traumatic brain injury, PTSD, depression, and suicide among veterans and references studies showing outdoor exposure can benefit mental health.
The resolution notes the Forest Service’s National Get Outdoors Day and existing free admission for veterans to national parks and encourages the Department of Veterans Affairs, the Forest Service, and the Department of the Interior to coordinate promotion of Veterans Get Outside Day.
The text is a non-binding statement of support and encouragement rather than a law that creates new funding or mandates.
On substance the proposal is noncontroversial and would likely pass as a sense/resolution in a chamber, but the form is a House resolution expressing support and encouragement rather than a bill that creates law or requires enactment. As written, it cannot become statutory law; therefore the chance that this exact text becomes law is effectively nil. If sponsors sought a statutory designation instead, that would be a different vehicle with higher practical chances but would still depend on sponsor strategy and floor scheduling.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise commemorative resolution that lays out rationale for designating the second Saturday in June as 'Veterans Get Outside Day' and nonbindingly encourages relevant agencies to coordinate with existing outdoor programs.
Liberals emphasize the need for concrete funding, accessibility, and integration with VA mental-health services; conservatives emphasize keeping the designation symbolic and avoiding new federal costs.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize the need for concrete funding, accessibility, and integration with VA mental-health services; conservatives emphasize keeping the designation symbolic and avoiding new federal costs.
A mainstream liberal would likely welcome the resolution’s focus on veteran mental health and the use of nature-based approaches as a complementary support.
They would view the designation as a positive, low-cost symbolic step that could raise awareness and encourage outreach to veterans.
However, they would also see it as insufficient on its own and emphasize the need for concrete investments in VA mental health services, suicide prevention, disability accommodations, transportation, and follow-up care.
A centrist would view the resolution as a broadly agreeable, low-risk symbolic measure to recognize veterans and promote coordination among agencies.
They would appreciate the public-health framing and the invitation for agencies to cooperate, while noting that it is non-binding and contains no new spending.
They would favor practical follow-up: clear roles for agencies, measurable goals, and assurance that activities are cost-neutral or funded within existing budgets.
A mainstream conservative would likely view this resolution favorably as a patriotic, low-cost recognition of veterans and an endorsement of outdoor activity and family-friendly community events.
They would appreciate that the measure does not create new entitlements or appropriations.
Some conservatives might still caution against expanding federal program responsibilities or coordination that could create bureaucratic tasks without clear benefit.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
On substance the proposal is noncontroversial and would likely pass as a sense/resolution in a chamber, but the form is a House resolution expressing support and encouragement rather than a bill that creates law or requires enactment. As written, it cannot become statutory law; therefore the chance that this exact text becomes law is effectively nil. If sponsors sought a statutory designation instead, that would be a different vehicle with higher practical chances but would still depend on sponsor strategy and floor scheduling.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize the need for concrete funding, accessibility, and integration with VA mental-health services; conservatives emphasize ke…
On substance the proposal is noncontroversial and would likely pass as a sense/resolution in a chamber, but the form is a House resolution…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise commemorative resolution that lays out rationale for designating the second Saturday in June as 'Veterans Get Outside Day' and nonbindingly encourages re…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.