H. Res. 6 (119th)Bill Overview

Fixing the daily hour of meeting of the First Session of the One Hundred Nineteenth Congress.

Simple ResolutionCongress|CongressCongressional operations and organization
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Jan 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageFloor

Motion to reconsider laid on the table Agreed to without objection.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution sets the regular daily meeting times for the House during the first session of the 119th Congress: 2 p.m. on Mondays; noon on Tuesdays (or 2 p.m. if no legislative business occurred the preceding Monday); noon on Wednesdays and Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all other days. It is an internal House order about when the chamber will convene each day unless the House decides otherwise. It does not create law for anyone outside the House and applies only to the House's internal proceedings.

Passage rules

This is a simple resolution acted on by the House alone to set its internal schedule; it is not sent to the Senate or the President and does not have the force of law outside the House. The schedule can be changed by the House when it chooses, as the text says 'unless otherwise ordered.'

This House resolution sets the default daily meeting times for the House of Representatives: 2 p.m. on Mondays; noon on Tuesdays (or 2 p.m. if no legislative business occurred Monday); noon on Wednesdays and Thursdays; and 9 a.m. on all other days.

It is an internal House procedural rule establishing when the House will convene each day unless otherwise ordered.

The resolution deals only with chamber meeting times rather than substantive policy.

Passage85/100

Very likely to be adopted as a House procedural resolution due to narrow administrative nature; it is not a public law and requires no Senate or presidential action.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-specified administrative resolution that sets default House meeting times with a small, explicit conditional exception. It provides clear operational detail appropriate to its narrow scope while leaving broader supervisory and fiscal matters implicit, which is normal for this kind of internal rule.

Contention18/100

Progressives stress transparency and oversight risks

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitProvides predictable start times for members and staff planning travel and constituency work.
  • Potential benefitMay reduce frequency of late-night floor sessions, improving staff and member work-life balance.
  • Potential benefitCould lower overtime pay and related costs if fewer sessions run into late hours.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenLimits leadership flexibility to convene the House at alternative times for urgent matters.
  • Potential burdenCould delay emergency or time-sensitive legislative action if constrained by default times.
  • Potential burdenMay shift workload to other hours, complicating staff childcare and personal schedules.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives stress transparency and oversight risks
Progressive70%

Seen as a routine procedural rule with modest practical effects.

Supportive if it improves member availability for constituent work and public outreach.

Wary that set meeting times could be used to concentrate votes or limit public access and oversight if leadership abuses scheduling.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

A technical, administrative update to House operations that mainly improves predictability.

Generally sees it as low-risk, but wants assurances that urgent business can be handled and that costs or disruptions are minimal.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Viewed largely as routine housekeeping for chamber efficiency.

Likely supportive so long as it preserves leadership ability to schedule necessary business and does not expand federal authority outside the House.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Reached or meaningfully advanced

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood85/100

Very likely to be adopted as a House procedural resolution due to narrow administrative nature; it is not a public law and requires no Senate or presidential action.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Possible Member objections during initial adoption
  • Interaction with existing House standing rules
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives stress transparency and oversight risks

Very likely to be adopted as a House procedural resolution due to narrow administrative nature; it is not a public law and requires no Sena…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, well-specified administrative resolution that sets default House meeting times with a small, explicit conditional exception. It provides clear operation…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis