Referred to the House Committee on Agriculture.
This resolution designates the week of August 3 through August 9, 2025, as "National Farmers Market Week" and expresses the House's support for that designation. It is a formal recognition and statement of support, not a law that creates new programs or spending. The text highlights the economic, community, health, and educational roles of farmers markets and encourages awareness of them. It does not change federal policy or create enforceable rights.
This is a simple resolution adopted by the House alone; it does not go to the Senate or the President and has no binding legal effect. Its passage only requires approval within the House under normal House procedures.
This House resolution designates August 3 through August 9, 2025, as "National Farmers Market Week." The text cites data on farmers market income and growth, and describes farmers markets as supporting local economies, food access, sustainable farming practices, education about agriculture, and connections between urban and rural communities.
The resolution states that Congress supports the designation and recognizes the role of farmers markets in communities and livelihoods.
The resolution is a symbolic congressional recognition and does not authorize spending or create new legal requirements.
As a House simple resolution that merely designates a commemorative week and contains no binding provisions, the measure cannot, in its current form, become law. Its likelihood of being enacted into law is effectively zero unless reintroduced in a different legislative vehicle that both chambers and the President (if required) act upon — an unlikely outcome for a ceremonial observance.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose and provides supporting rationale while intentionally omitting operational, fiscal, and enforcement details that are not appropriate for a symbolic designation.
Extent of desired follow-up: liberals want concrete funding/access expansions; conservatives prefer no federal spending—centrists seek measured, evidence-based next steps.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Extent of desired follow-up: liberals want concrete funding/access expansions; conservatives prefer no federal spending—centrists seek measured, evidence-based next steps.
A mainstream liberal would generally view this resolution positively as a symbolic recognition of local food systems, food access, and sustainable agriculture.
They would welcome attention to farmers markets as sites that can improve nutrition for low-income people receiving federal nutrition benefits and promote environmentally friendly farming practices.
They would likely see the resolution as useful but insufficient on its own, preferring it to be paired with concrete policy measures to expand access and support small and diversified farms.
A mainstream centrist would regard the resolution as a low-cost, noncontroversial recognition that highlights an economic and community asset.
They would appreciate the bipartisan, symbolic nature of the measure and see it as a straightforward way to raise awareness without creating regulatory or fiscal commitments.
Centrists would note the resolution's lack of enforceable policy or budgetary effects and might call for measured follow-up (data collection, targeted programs) rather than immediate large spending.
A mainstream conservative would likely view the resolution as largely harmless and noncontroversial, since it is symbolic and does not create new regulations or spending.
They may appreciate the emphasis on local markets, small-scale entrepreneurship, and community self-reliance.
Some conservatives might question the need for Congressional involvement in designating awareness weeks but would generally not oppose it.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a House simple resolution that merely designates a commemorative week and contains no binding provisions, the measure cannot, in its current form, become law. Its likelihood of being enacted into law is effectively zero unless reintroduced in a different legislative vehicle that both chambers and the President (if required) act upon — an unlikely outcome for a ceremonial observance.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Extent of desired follow-up: liberals want concrete funding/access expansions; conservatives prefer no federal spending—centrists seek meas…
As a House simple resolution that merely designates a commemorative week and contains no binding provisions, the measure cannot, in its cur…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative resolution that clearly states its purpose and provides supporting rationale while intentionally omitting operational, fiscal, and…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.