H. Res. 67 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the roles and the contributions of Americas Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) and their critical role in providing quality health care for the public and the Nation's Armed Forces for more than 150 years and through multiple public health emergencies and beyond.

Simple ResolutionHealth|Cardiovascular and respiratory healthCommemorative events and holidays
Cosponsors
Support
Lean Democratic
Introduced
Jan 24, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Energy and Commerce.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a House simple resolution that thanks and recognizes Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs) and highlights National CRNA Week. It expresses the House’s support and encourages patients, health care leaders, and policymakers to use and recognize CRNAs, but it does not create binding law or change federal agencies’ duties. A simple resolution applies only to the chamber that passed it and is not sent to the President. It is a formal statement of appreciation and encouragement rather than a legally enforceable action.

This House resolution recognizes Certified Registered Nurse Anesthetists (CRNAs), thanks them for over 150 years of service, and highlights their role in providing anesthesia care across settings.

It cites that CRNAs administer over 58,000,000 anesthetics yearly, serve particularly in rural and military/VA settings, and encourages use of CRNAs to their full potential and participation in National CRNA Week (Jan 19–25, 2025).

The resolution is declarative and nonbinding.

Passage2/100

As a non‑binding House resolution, it expresses sentiment but does not create law; passage in House likely, statutory enactment effectively nil.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly recognizes the contributions of CRNAs, designates National CRNA Week (January 19–25, 2025), and encourages participation by stakeholders. Its construction is typical for a symbolic resolution: clear in purpose, modestly specific about the occasion, but lacking implementation, fiscal, or oversight detail—elements that are not normally required for this type of measure.

Contention25/100

Liberal emphasizes need for follow-up funding, pay, and protections

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Likely helpedFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitRaises public awareness of CRNAs and their clinical roles.
  • Potential benefitEncourages greater utilization of CRNAs by hospitals and policymakers.
  • Potential benefitSupports maintenance and expansion of anesthesia access in rural and underserved areas.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenIs symbolic and creates no legal, regulatory, or funding changes.
  • Potential burdenMay intensify scope-of-practice disputes between CRNAs and physician anesthesiologists.
  • Federal agenciesCould be portrayed as federal endorsement influencing state licensing debates despite lacking force.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes need for follow-up funding, pay, and protections
Progressive85%

Likely views the resolution positively as recognition of an essential, often underappreciated healthcare workforce and as support for rural and underserved communities.

Would welcome awareness but want follow-up policies addressing pay, labor protections, and equitable access.

May be cautious that symbolism not replace concrete investment.

Leans supportive
Centrist90%

Will view the resolution as a benign, nonbinding acknowledgement of a healthcare profession that supports rural care delivery.

Appreciates symbolic recognition but will look for assurance that patient safety, oversight, and clear limits on federal authority are maintained.

Leans supportive
Conservative70%

Generally supportive of honoring healthcare workers and improving rural access, but cautious about any federal encouragement that could pressure employers or preempt state scope-of-practice rules.

Sees the resolution as mostly ceremonial, but will flag potential implications for federal overreach.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood2/100

As a non‑binding House resolution, it expresses sentiment but does not create law; passage in House likely, statutory enactment effectively nil.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will schedule it for floor consideration
  • If a companion Senate resolution will be introduced
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes need for follow-up funding, pay, and protections

As a non‑binding House resolution, it expresses sentiment but does not create law; passage in House likely, statutory enactment effectively…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution that clearly recognizes the contributions of CRNAs, designates National CRNA Week (January 19–25, 2025), and encou…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis