Referred to the House Committee on Foreign Affairs.
This resolution is a formal statement from the House expressing strong disapproval of the President's announced withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, commending supporters of the Agreement, and urging the President to reverse course and Congress to act. It is a message to the President, the public, and other lawmakers but does not itself change U.S. policy or legally bind the President or federal agencies. The resolution does not alter the United States' membership in the Paris Agreement or create new legal requirements.
Simple resolutions are considered and voted on only in the chamber that introduced them and do not go to the President; they are non-binding expressions of the chamber's view and do not change law.
This House resolution expresses strong disapproval of the President’s announcement to withdraw the United States from the Paris Agreement.
It cites climate impacts, economic and security risks, recent federal climate investments and jobs, and urges the President to reverse the decision while commending subnational and private actors that support the Agreement.
As a non‑binding House resolution it does not create law; such measures rarely advance in the Senate or have binding effect.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this House resolution is a well‑constructed symbolic statement: it clearly defines the issue and uses standard declaratory language to express disapproval and to urge executive and legislative action. It does not attempt statutory change or create implementation obligations, and therefore appropriately omits funding, enforcement, and detailed implementation mechanisms.
Liberals stress climate, health, and jobs benefits of staying in Paris
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals stress climate, health, and jobs benefits of staying in Paris
Sees the resolution as necessary and appropriate symbolic opposition to withdrawal and a call to uphold climate commitments.
Views re-engagement with Paris as essential for public health, equity, jobs, and U.S. global leadership.
Generally favors the resolution's goal of U.S. engagement but notes it's nonbinding and lacks implementation detail.
Wants attention to costs, competitiveness, and orderly transition for workers and regions.
Likely opposes the resolution as a critique of the President and as support for international commitments seen as potentially costly.
Prefers market-driven or sovereign approaches to climate and skepticism about rejoining Paris.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
As a non‑binding House resolution it does not create law; such measures rarely advance in the Senate or have binding effect.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals stress climate, health, and jobs benefits of staying in Paris
As a non‑binding House resolution it does not create law; such measures rarely advance in the Senate or have binding effect.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this House resolution is a well‑constructed symbolic statement: it clearly defines the issue and uses standard declaratory language to express disapproval and to urge executive…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.