Referred to the Committee on Energy and Commerce, and in addition to the Committee on Science, Space, and Technology, for a period to be subsequently determined by the Speaker, in…
This resolution expresses the House of Representatives' support for naming September 15 through September 19, 2025, as National Clean Energy Week and encourages people and organizations to back clean energy efforts. It highlights clean energy jobs, the Department of Energy National Laboratories, and urges investment in affordable, low-emitting energy technologies. It is a non-binding statement and does not create or change federal law.
As a simple House resolution, it only needs approval in the House of Representatives; it does not go to the Senate or the President and does not have the force of law. It is a formal expression of the House's view rather than a binding legal action.
This House resolution expresses support for designating September 15–19, 2025, as "National Clean Energy Week." It praises the growth of the clean energy sector, cites employment in energy and energy-efficiency industries, applauds Department of Energy national laboratories, and encourages federal, state, local, and private investment in affordable, clean, and low-emitting energy technologies.
The resolution also endorses reliable and affordable energy for Americans and recognizes the role of entrepreneurs and small businesses in clean energy development.
It is a non-binding, symbolic statement rather than a law or appropriation.
This is a non‑binding House resolution that expresses support for a themed week and contains no statutory changes, appropriations, or regulatory directives. Such resolutions do not become law or require Presidential signature, so the chance of this text becoming a binding law is effectively nil. The only realistic outcome is House adoption as a ceremonial or commemorative act, which is likely content-wise but would not produce a law.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a straightforward commemorative instrument: it clearly states the designation, provides rationale in Whereas clauses, and uses appropriate expressive and hortatory operative language without attempting to create legal obligations or funding authorities.
Degree of enthusiasm: liberals emphasize climate and jobs; conservatives emphasize caution about future mandates or subsidies.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Degree of enthusiasm: liberals emphasize climate and jobs; conservatives emphasize caution about future mandates or subsidies.
Overall, a mainstream progressive would view this resolution positively as a symbolic acknowledgement of the economic and climate importance of expanding clean energy.
They would welcome the focus on jobs, DOE labs, and local employment created by clean energy deployment.
They would see this as a modest but useful signal from Congress supporting decarbonization, innovation, and workforce development.
A moderate would generally find this resolution agreeable as a noncontroversial, pro-jobs, pro-innovation statement that does not impose new regulations or spending.
They would appreciate the emphasis on affordability, reliability, and support for small businesses and national labs.
However, they'd note the resolution's vagueness and limited practical effect, and they would look for costed, pragmatic follow-on policies rather than rhetoric alone.
A mainstream conservative would likely be cautiously supportive of a symbolic recognition that highlights jobs, small businesses, and energy reliability, but wary of implicit policy goals favoring decarbonization or federal-directed investment.
Because the resolution does not enact regulations or spending, many conservatives would see it as low-risk; others may suspect it signals support for subsidies or mandates down the line.
Support would be higher among conservatives who prioritize energy innovation and local jobs, and lower among those who view 'clean energy' as a euphemism for costly federal programs.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
This is a non‑binding House resolution that expresses support for a themed week and contains no statutory changes, appropriations, or regulatory directives. Such resolutions do not become law or require Presidential signature, so the chance of this text becoming a binding law is effectively nil. The only realistic outcome is House adoption as a ceremonial or commemorative act, which is likely content-wise but would not produce a law.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Degree of enthusiasm: liberals emphasize climate and jobs; conservatives emphasize caution about future mandates or subsidies.
This is a non‑binding House resolution that expresses support for a themed week and contains no statutory changes, appropriations, or regul…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this resolution is a straightforward commemorative instrument: it clearly states the designation, provides rationale in Whereas clauses, and uses appropriate expressive and hor…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.