Referred to the House Committee on Science, Space, and Technology.
This House resolution expresses support for designating November 19, 2025, as "National GIS Day." It describes the importance of Geographic Information System (GIS) technology for government, private enterprise, education, and research, highlights GIS contributions to the National Spatial Data Infrastructure (NSDI), and encourages GIS users, educators, students, and innovators to continue using GIS to learn, analyze societal challenges, and drive economic growth.
The resolution is a nonbinding statement of support and does not appropriate funds or change law.
On content alone the measure is highly likely to be approved within the House because it is short, nonbinding, and uncontroversial. However, a simple House resolution is not a statute and does not become law; the only way this content would become law is if enacted in a different statutory vehicle, which is unlikely given the symbolic nature of the text. Therefore the chance of this exact resolution becoming law is effectively negligible.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a typical commemorative House resolution: it clearly states its purpose and provides direct but limited mechanisms (expression of support and broad encouragement) appropriate to a symbolic designation. It does not create legal obligations, appropriate funds, or change existing statutes.
Privacy and surveillance concerns: both left and right flag risks, though left emphasizes data equity and community control while right emphasizes federal overreach and state authority.
Privacy and surveillance concerns: both left and right flag risks, though left emphasizes data equity and community control while right emphasizes federal overreach and state authority.
A mainstream progressive would generally view this as a positive, low-cost recognition of a technology that supports STEM education, community mapping, environmental analysis, and research.
They would appreciate the resolution's attention to GIS as a tool for addressing societal and cultural issues and for fostering collaboration across public, private, and academic sectors.
However, they would note missing safeguards around data equity, privacy, and community control of geospatial data, and would be cautious about corporate capture of public geospatial resources.
A pragmatic, moderate observer would treat this resolution as a routine, noncontroversial recognition that promotes STEM, public–private cooperation, and awareness of useful government capabilities.
They would value the educational and economic development framing and appreciate that the resolution itself imposes no new mandates or spending.
They would also note that the resolution is symbolic and watch for whether any substantive policy, funding, or governance proposals follow that could raise trade-offs.
A mainstream conservative would likely regard this resolution as innocuous and broadly useful for promoting U.S. technological capacity, STEM education, and private-sector growth in geospatial tools.
They would appreciate the nonbinding nature and potential benefits for economic competitiveness and national security applications of improved mapping and data.
At the same time, they would be attentive to possible expansions of federal authority or data-sharing that could intrude on state or private control or enable increased surveillance, and would prefer any follow-up to respect federalism and private-sector leadership.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
On content alone the measure is highly likely to be approved within the House because it is short, nonbinding, and uncontroversial. However, a simple House resolution is not a statute and does not become law; the only way this content would become law is if enacted in a different statutory vehicle, which is unlikely given the symbolic nature of the text. Therefore the chance of this exact resolution becoming law is effectively negligible.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Privacy and surveillance concerns: both left and right flag risks, though left emphasizes data equity and community control while right emp…
On content alone the measure is highly likely to be approved within the House because it is short, nonbinding, and uncontroversial. However…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a typical commemorative House resolution: it clearly states its purpose and provides direct but limited mechanisms (expression of support and broad encouragement)…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.