H. Res. 917 (119th)Bill Overview

Congratulating Korson's Tree Farms in Montcalm County in Sidney Township for being selected to provide the 2025 White House Christmas Tree.

Simple ResolutionGovernment Operations and Politics|Government Operations and Politics
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Dec 1, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution congratulates Korson's Tree Farms for being selected to provide the 2025 White House Christmas Tree, recognizes the importance of Michigan's Christmas tree industry, invites the farm to the U.S. Capitol for an honor, and directs the House Clerk to send copies to the President and First Lady for display. It is a formal statement of the House celebrating the farm and the industry. It does not create new law or direct federal agencies to take action.

Passage rules

This is a House simple resolution that only requires passage in the House; it is not sent to the Senate or the President and does not have the force of law.

This House resolution congratulates Korson’s Tree Farms of Montcalm County, Michigan, for being selected to provide the 2025 White House Christmas Tree after winning the National Christmas Tree Association contest.

It notes the farm’s contest history and Michigan’s broader Christmas-tree industry statistics, recognizes the agricultural and economic importance of the industry, invites the farm to the U.S. Capitol to be honored, and directs the Clerk to provide enrolled copies of the resolution to President Donald J.

Trump and First Lady Melania Trump.

Passage0/100

This is a nonbinding House resolution (H. Res.) that expresses congratulations and makes routine administrative invitations; such resolutions do not create law and are not enrolled as statutes. Based on content alone, there is effectively no pathway for this text to become law without converting it into a different legislative vehicle.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, supplies appropriate and specific ceremonial actions, and imposes minimal administrative direction consistent with its scope.

Contention10/100

All three personas broadly support the resolution, but the progressive is slightly more likely to note procedural opportunity costs and wish for substantive agricultural support.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · StatesCities

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Local governmentsProvides national publicity and marketing value to Korson’s Tree Farms and Michigan’s Christmas tree industry, which co…
  • StatesSymbolically recognizes and may strengthen advocacy for the agricultural sector by highlighting the industry’s economic…
  • Federal agenciesHas no direct regulatory or budgetary effect and does not create new federal requirements, obligations, or spending.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenAs a ceremonial resolution, critics may argue it uses congressional time and attention for symbolic recognition rather…
  • CitiesCould be viewed as giving preferential publicity to a single private business or region, raising questions about the ap…
  • Potential burdenEnvironmental critics may object that celebrating the cut-tree industry emphasizes harvest of cut evergreens rather tha…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

All three personas broadly support the resolution, but the progressive is slightly more likely to note procedural opportunity costs and wish for substantive agricultural support.
Progressive80%

A liberal-leaning observer would view this resolution as a routine, symbolic congratulatory measure that primarily honors a small business and a state agricultural sector.

They would likely consider it overall benign but might question whether floor or committee time could be used for more substantive matters.

They may appreciate recognition of local agriculture and rural jobs but could note the explicit naming of President Trump and the First Lady as a mild partisan element, though not a policy concern.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

A centrist would treat this as a low-stakes, customary resolution honoring a local producer whose tree was selected for a ceremonial national display.

They would view it as an appropriate way to celebrate local industry and constituent achievement, while noting it has no regulatory or budgetary effect.

They might have a minor practical concern about use of floor or committee time for ceremonial matters but would generally see it as unobjectionable and useful for constituent relations.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

A mainstream conservative would view the resolution positively as a small-government, apolitical recognition of private-sector success and American agriculture.

They would likely appreciate the praise for a family-owned farm and the celebration of domestic production, and would favor the symbolic connection to the President and First Lady.

Because the resolution is non-regulatory and carries no spending commitments, it aligns with conservative preference for limited government action.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood0/100

This is a nonbinding House resolution (H. Res.) that expresses congratulations and makes routine administrative invitations; such resolutions do not create law and are not enrolled as statutes. Based on content alone, there is effectively no pathway for this text to become law without converting it into a different legislative vehicle.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the resolution will be brought to the House floor for consideration (though historically similar ceremonial resolutions are typically considered by unanimous consent).
  • Whether any Members object to procedural scheduling or to the specific instruction to provide copies to the named President and First Lady, which could marginally affect floor action though such objections are rare.
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

All three personas broadly support the resolution, but the progressive is slightly more likely to note procedural opportunity costs and wis…

This is a nonbinding House resolution (H. Res.) that expresses congratulations and makes routine administrative invitations; such resolutio…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-constructed commemorative resolution: it clearly states its purpose, supplies appropriate and specific ceremonial actions, and imposes minimal administrativ…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis