Referred to the House Committee on House Administration.
This resolution sets the maximum amount of House funds the Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence may spend during the 119th Congress. It specifies a total dollar cap and divides that total between the two congressional sessions. It requires payments to be made on vouchers authorized by the committee and says spending must follow rules set by the Committee on House Administration. The measure governs internal House committee spending and is an internal House action, not a law that applies outside the chamber.
This resolution provides funding for the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence for the 119th Congress.
It authorizes up to $19,240,928 total, split into $9,538,983 for the first session year and $9,701,945 for the second.
Payments are to be made by vouchers authorized by the Committee and expended under Committee on House Administration regulations.
Likely to be adopted/implemented within the House, but it is an internal House resolution and not a statute that becomes law.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative/operational resolution that is clear about purpose, specific in dollar amounts and timing, and provides a straightforward implementation path via named House entities and established regulatory oversight.
Liberals emphasize civil-liberties oversight and transparency
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize civil-liberties oversight and transparency
Likely generally supportive because the funding sustains congressional intelligence oversight capacity.
They will emphasize using the resources to protect civil liberties, strengthen investigative staff, and ensure transparency and accountability of intelligence activities.
Generally supportive as a routine, necessary appropriation for a standing committee.
They will look for fiscal prudence, adherence to House Administration rules, and bipartisan use of the funds.
Cautious support may be likely because oversight of intelligence aligns with national security priorities.
However, they will be wary of funds being used for partisan purposes and seek strict accountability and limits on spending growth.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Likely to be adopted/implemented within the House, but it is an internal House resolution and not a statute that becomes law.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize civil-liberties oversight and transparency
Likely to be adopted/implemented within the House, but it is an internal House resolution and not a statute that becomes law.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative/operational resolution that is clear about purpose, specific in dollar amounts and timing, and provides a straightforward implemen…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.