H. Res. 983 (119th)Bill Overview

Recognizing the 30th anniversary of the first flight of the F/A-18 E1 Super Hornet from Lambert Field in St. Louis, Missouri, and the 30 years of service of the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet to the United States Navy and to allies of the United States.

Armed Forces and National Security|Armed Forces and National Security
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Jan 8, 2026
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This non‑binding House resolution recognizes the 30th anniversary of the F/A–18E/F Super Hornet’s first flight and three decades of service.

It lists historical milestones, deployments, allied use, museum accession in St.

Louis, and honors pilots, weapons officers, and maintenance teams.

Passage5/100

Substantively noncontroversial and likely to be agreed in chamber(s), but as a House resolution it does not create binding law and cannot become statute.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution: it clearly articulates the recognition, supplies supporting factual context, and includes a simple administrative directive to transmit an enrolled copy to a museum.

Contention30/100

Progressives worry about glorifying recent strikes; conservative celebrates operational use.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Local governmentsTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersProvides symbolic recognition that may boost morale among Navy aircrews and maintenance personnel.
  • Targeted stakeholdersHighlights St. Louis manufacturing heritage and visibility for the domestic defense industrial base.
  • Local governmentsMay modestly increase museum visitation and related local tourism revenue in St. Louis.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersThe resolution is symbolic and creates no legal, budgetary, or regulatory changes.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCritics may view it as endorsing or celebrating past and recent military strikes without policy debate.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay be criticized for normalizing weapons procurement and continued emphasis on offensive platforms.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives worry about glorifying recent strikes; conservative celebrates operational use.
Progressive60%

Likely supportive of honoring service members and museum preservation, but cautious about celebratory language around recent strikes.

May view the resolution as symbolic without addressing civilian harm, oversight, or defense spending priorities.

Split reaction
Centrist85%

Will likely view the resolution as routine, bipartisan recognition of a long‑serving aircraft and its personnel.

Sees it as symbolic with local economic and cultural value and minimal policy consequences.

Leans supportive
Conservative95%

Strongly favorable: praises national defense, naval aviation, domestic manufacturing, and personnel.

Views the resolution as appropriate recognition of a key U.S. military asset and its role in deterrence and operations.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood5/100

Substantively noncontroversial and likely to be agreed in chamber(s), but as a House resolution it does not create binding law and cannot become statute.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House will schedule it for floor consideration
  • Potential objections over cited military operations or phrasing
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives worry about glorifying recent strikes; conservative celebrates operational use.

Substantively noncontroversial and likely to be agreed in chamber(s), but as a House resolution it does not create binding law and cannot b…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution: it clearly articulates the recognition, supplies supporting factual context, and includes a simple administrative…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis