- Targeted stakeholdersProvides symbolic recognition that may boost morale among Navy aircrews and maintenance personnel.
- Targeted stakeholdersHighlights St. Louis manufacturing heritage and visibility for the domestic defense industrial base.
- Local governmentsMay modestly increase museum visitation and related local tourism revenue in St. Louis.
Recognizing the 30th anniversary of the first flight of the F/A-18 E1 Super Hornet from Lambert Field in St. Louis, Missouri, and the 30 years of service of the F/A-18E/F Super Hornet to the United States Navy and to allies of the United States.
Referred to the House Committee on Armed Services.
This non‑binding House resolution recognizes the 30th anniversary of the F/A–18E/F Super Hornet’s first flight and three decades of service.
It lists historical milestones, deployments, allied use, museum accession in St.
Louis, and honors pilots, weapons officers, and maintenance teams.
Substantively noncontroversial and likely to be agreed in chamber(s), but as a House resolution it does not create binding law and cannot become statute.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution: it clearly articulates the recognition, supplies supporting factual context, and includes a simple administrative directive to transmit an enrolled copy to a museum.
Progressives worry about glorifying recent strikes; conservative celebrates operational use.
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Targeted stakeholdersThe resolution is symbolic and creates no legal, budgetary, or regulatory changes.
- Targeted stakeholdersCritics may view it as endorsing or celebrating past and recent military strikes without policy debate.
- Targeted stakeholdersMay be criticized for normalizing weapons procurement and continued emphasis on offensive platforms.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Progressives worry about glorifying recent strikes; conservative celebrates operational use.
Likely supportive of honoring service members and museum preservation, but cautious about celebratory language around recent strikes.
May view the resolution as symbolic without addressing civilian harm, oversight, or defense spending priorities.
Will likely view the resolution as routine, bipartisan recognition of a long‑serving aircraft and its personnel.
Sees it as symbolic with local economic and cultural value and minimal policy consequences.
Strongly favorable: praises national defense, naval aviation, domestic manufacturing, and personnel.
Views the resolution as appropriate recognition of a key U.S. military asset and its role in deterrence and operations.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantively noncontroversial and likely to be agreed in chamber(s), but as a House resolution it does not create binding law and cannot become statute.
- Whether the House will schedule it for floor consideration
- Potential objections over cited military operations or phrasing
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Progressives worry about glorifying recent strikes; conservative celebrates operational use.
Substantively noncontroversial and likely to be agreed in chamber(s), but as a House resolution it does not create binding law and cannot b…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward commemorative House resolution: it clearly articulates the recognition, supplies supporting factual context, and includes a simple administrative…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.