H. Res. 99 (119th)Bill Overview

Raising awareness and encouraging the prevention of stalking by designating January 2025 as "National Stalking Awareness Month".

Simple ResolutionCrime and Law Enforcement|Assault and harassment offensesCommemorative events and holidays
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Feb 4, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Referred to the House Committee on the Judiciary.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Simple ResolutionWhat this resolution actually does

This resolution is a nonbinding House measure that names January 2025 as National Stalking Awareness Month. It expresses the House's support for raising awareness, encouraging prevention, and applauding organizations that help stalking victims. It does not create new law, spend money, or require action by other branches or agencies. It simply states the House's position and intent to promote outreach and education.

Passage rules

As a simple House resolution, it only needs passage by the House and is not sent to the Senate or the President. It is not legally binding and does not change federal law or funding.

This House resolution designates January 2025 as "National Stalking Awareness Month." It cites statistics on stalking prevalence, emphasizes technology-facilitated stalking, and applauds providers, law enforcement, campuses, and community organizations.

The resolution encourages policymakers, victim services, institutions of higher education, and media to raise awareness and improve responses to stalking but contains no new funding or legal mandates.

Passage2/100

This is a symbolic House resolution that does not create binding law; such measures rarely, if ever, become statute.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it defines the problem in detail, designates National Stalking Awareness Month (January 2025), and urges stakeholders to act, without creating legal obligations or funding authorities.

Contention12/100

Liberty of remedies: liberals want funding and services; conservatives prefer symbolic action.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
CommunitiesLikely burdened

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitMay increase public awareness and potentially raise reporting to police and victim service providers.
  • Potential benefitEncourages colleges and universities to adopt or strengthen campus stalking prevention and response programs.
  • CommunitiesAcknowledges and may bolster community and nonprofit efforts, possibly aiding private donations or volunteer engagement.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenDoes not authorize funding, so it will not directly expand victim services or create jobs.
  • Potential burdenIs nonbinding and creates no new legal authorities, penalties, or enforcement mechanisms.
  • Potential burdenCould be primarily symbolic without producing measurable reductions in stalking incidence or harm.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberty of remedies: liberals want funding and services; conservatives prefer symbolic action.
Progressive95%

Generally supportive; views designation as a useful awareness tool that highlights victims, campus risks, and technology-facilitated stalking.

Would like the resolution to spur increased, survivor-centered services and better prevention policies.

Leans supportive
Centrist85%

Supportive but pragmatic; sees the designation as low-cost, bipartisan awareness-building.

Wants clarity on measurable outcomes and avoids unfunded or duplicative initiatives.

Leans supportive
Conservative75%

Likely supportive in principle because it protects victims and supports law enforcement.

May be cautious about expanding federal involvement or implying new mandates.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood2/100

This is a symbolic House resolution that does not create binding law; such measures rarely, if ever, become statute.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether the House schedules floor consideration
  • Existence of a companion Senate resolution
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberty of remedies: liberals want funding and services; conservatives prefer symbolic action.

This is a symbolic House resolution that does not create binding law; such measures rarely, if ever, become statute.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions as a straightforward commemorative resolution: it defines the problem in detail, designates National Stalking Awareness Month (January 2025), and urges stak…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis