S. 1036 (119th)Bill Overview

Improving Access to Addiction Medicine Providers Act

Health|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends section 597 of the Public Health Service Act (the Minority Fellowship Program) to authorize awarding fellowships for training professionals in the addiction medicine field. It inserts addiction medicine (and related training/diagnosis language) among eligible fields for minority-focused fellowships, expanding the program's scope to include addiction medicine training.

Why people may split

Liberal emphasizes equity, workforce expansion, public-health framing.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrow statutory amendment that clearly identifies its objective and integrates directly into the existing Minority Fellowship statutory text, but it provides minimal operational, fiscal, definitional, or accountability detail.

This bill amends section 597 of the Public Health Service Act (the Minority Fellowship Program) to authorize awarding fellowships for training professionals in the addiction medicine field.

It inserts addiction medicine (and related training/diagnosis language) among eligible fields for minority-focused fellowships, expanding the program's scope to include addiction medicine training.

Passage70/100

Small, technical expansion of an existing program with limited fiscal footprint typically has good prospects, though passage depends on committee/time and funding.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrow statutory amendment that clearly identifies its objective and integrates directly into the existing Minority Fellowship statutory text, but it provides minimal operational, fiscal, definitional, or accountability detail.

Contention30/100

Liberal emphasizes equity, workforce expansion, public-health framing.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitMay reduce access and care disparities for behavioral health in underserved areas.
  • Potential benefitSupports career development and retention of minority behavioral health professionals.
  • Federal agenciesFederal support may encourage academic programs to create or expand fellowships.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesAdds federal administrative responsibilities and potential program costs to implement expansion.
  • Potential burdenRequires congressional appropriations, so benefits are limited if funding is not provided.
  • Potential burdenMay not increase provider availability if graduates do not practice in underserved areas.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes equity, workforce expansion, public-health framing.
Progressive90%

Likely favorable; sees the bill as a targeted, equity-focused step to grow a diverse addiction-treatment workforce.

Views it as aligned with public-health approaches to the overdose crisis and improving care access in underserved communities.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally supportive as a narrowly targeted workforce-development measure, but wants clarity on costs, measurable outcomes, and implementation.

Sees value in bipartisan, incremental steps but expects oversight and accountability.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

Mildly supportive to cautious; may welcome more addiction-treatment providers but is wary of expanding federal programs and new spending.

Prefers state-led solutions and clear evidence of effectiveness.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Small, technical expansion of an existing program with limited fiscal footprint typically has good prospects, though passage depends on committee/time and funding.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No cost estimate or appropriation language included
  • Committee prioritization and scheduling unknown
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes equity, workforce expansion, public-health framing.

Small, technical expansion of an existing program with limited fiscal footprint typically has good prospects, though passage depends on com…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrow statutory amendment that clearly identifies its objective and integrates directly into the existing Minority Fellowship statutory text, but it provides mi…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis