Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
This bill amends the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to require that any National Park System unit charging an entrance fee must accept cash payments. It adds a single statutory subsection directing the Secretary of the Interior to ensure cash is accepted where entrance fees are charged.
Progressives stress equity for unbanked visitors.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative requirement that is clearly stated and integrated into the existing statutory provision, but it provides minimal implementation detail, no cost or resourcing provisions, and no mechanisms for exception handling or oversight.
This bill amends the Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act to require that any National Park System unit charging an entrance fee must accept cash payments.
It adds a single statutory subsection directing the Secretary of the Interior to ensure cash is accepted where entrance fees are charged.
The text does not specify implementation details, funding, or exceptions.
Narrow, low-cost administrative mandate with likely bipartisan appeal increases chances, though lack of exceptions and implementation questions leave some resistance.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative requirement that is clearly stated and integrated into the existing statutory provision, but it provides minimal implementation detail, no cost or resourcing provisions, and no mechanisms for exception handling or oversight.
Progressives stress equity for unbanked visitors.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives stress equity for unbanked visitors.
Likely supportive overall because the requirement improves access for unbanked, low-income, and cash-preferred visitors.
They will welcome the equity and inclusion rationale but may note the bill lacks operational funding and worker safety measures.
Generally favorable because the policy is straightforward and addresses practical access issues.
They will emphasize balancing access with reasonable operational guidance, cost estimates, and minimal administrative burden before full endorsement.
Likely supportive because the mandate protects individual choice and avoids forcing electronic-only transactions.
Some conservatives may object to an added federal requirement on park operations, but many will view it as minimal and pro-consumer.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow, low-cost administrative mandate with likely bipartisan appeal increases chances, though lack of exceptions and implementation questions leave some resistance.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives stress equity for unbanked visitors.
Narrow, low-cost administrative mandate with likely bipartisan appeal increases chances, though lack of exceptions and implementation quest…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped administrative requirement that is clearly stated and integrated into the existing statutory provision, but it provides minimal implementation de…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.