Read twice and referred to the Committee on Small Business and Entrepreneurship.
This bill amends the Small Business Act to add a definition of career and technical education (per the Perkins Act) and requires Small Business Development Centers and Women’s Business Centers to: help small businesses hire graduates of career and technical education programs, and help those graduates start small businesses. It mainly inserts these new assistance duties into existing SBDC and WBC program language.
Funding: liberals demand resources; conservatives worry about mandates.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted amendment to existing small business assistance statutes that clearly identifies the population to be added (career and technical education graduates) and the statutory locations to be changed.
This bill amends the Small Business Act to add a definition of career and technical education (per the Perkins Act) and requires Small Business Development Centers and Women’s Business Centers to: help small businesses hire graduates of career and technical education programs, and help those graduates start small businesses.
It mainly inserts these new assistance duties into existing SBDC and WBC program language.
The bill does not specify new funding or detailed implementation mechanisms.
Substantively uncontroversial and narrow, but absence of funding and many low-priority small bills means sizable chance of stalling.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted amendment to existing small business assistance statutes that clearly identifies the population to be added (career and technical education graduates) and the statutory locations to be changed. It provides minimal operational detail beyond the statutory insertion.
Funding: liberals demand resources; conservatives worry about mandates.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Funding: liberals demand resources; conservatives worry about mandates.
Likely supportive overall because it connects workforce training with entrepreneurship opportunities and targets CTE graduates.
Concerned the bill lacks explicit funding, equity safeguards, and outreach to underserved populations; would push for resources and measurement.
Generally favorable as a pragmatic linkage between vocational training and small business support, but cautious about costs and execution.
Would favor modest refinements: clarify resources, performance measures, and federal-state roles.
Cautiously supportive because it aids small businesses and workforce readiness, core conservative priorities.
Wary of any perceived expansion of federal requirements without funding and potential bureaucratic growth.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Substantively uncontroversial and narrow, but absence of funding and many low-priority small bills means sizable chance of stalling.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Funding: liberals demand resources; conservatives worry about mandates.
Substantively uncontroversial and narrow, but absence of funding and many low-priority small bills means sizable chance of stalling.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a targeted amendment to existing small business assistance statutes that clearly identifies the population to be added (career and technical education graduates) a…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.