S. 1052 (119th)Bill Overview

A bill to amend the John D. Dingell, Jr. Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act to reauthorize the National Volcano Early Warning and Monitoring System, and for other purposes.

Emergency Management|Emergency Management
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 13, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the John D. Dingell, Jr.

Why people may split

Left/center emphasize science, safety, and funding increases.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-targeted administrative/operational amendment that clearly integrates into the existing statute, enumerates modernization items, establishes governance elements, and adjusts authorization levels; however, it provides only moderate implementation detail and limited provisions for accountability, edge-case handling, and fiscal implementation.

This bill amends the John D.

Dingell, Jr.

Conservation, Management, and Recreation Act to reauthorize and modernize the National Volcano Early Warning and Monitoring System.

Passage80/100

Technical, low-controversy reauthorization with modest funding increase and collaborative provisions fits patterns of bills that clear Congress.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-targeted administrative/operational amendment that clearly integrates into the existing statute, enumerates modernization items, establishes governance elements, and adjusts authorization levels; however, it provides only moderate implementation detail and limited provisions for accountability, edge-case handling, and fiscal implementation.

Contention50/100

Left/center emphasize science, safety, and funding increases.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Communities · Local governmentsFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • CommunitiesImproved volcanic monitoring capacity and earlier warning issuance could reduce community risk and emergency response t…
  • Potential benefitModernized instrumentation and telemetry could create demand for technical jobs in installation, maintenance, and data…
  • Local governmentsStronger partnerships with States, universities, and observatories could enhance research, training, and local prepared…
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesHigher authorized federal spending increases budgetary obligations and potential pressure on appropriations.
  • Potential burdenExpanded instrumentation and telemetry maintenance may create ongoing operational costs not fully covered by authorizat…
  • Potential burdenUse of UAVs and pervasive sensing could raise privacy or airspace management concerns among communities.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Left/center emphasize science, safety, and funding increases.
Progressive90%

Likely broadly supportive: the bill strengthens scientific monitoring, increases funding, and improves intergovernmental coordination to protect communities.

It aligns with priorities for investment in hazard mitigation and public safety via modern technologies and public communications.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

Generally favorable but pragmatic: supports modernization and better coordination while seeking clarity on costs, implementation responsibilities, and measurable outcomes.

Will weigh benefits against budget tradeoffs and oversight needs.

Leans supportive
Conservative40%

Cautious or moderately skeptical: the goal of hazard monitoring is accepted, but the bill expands federal authority, increases authorized spending, and creates new committees.

Concerns focus on cost, federal overreach, and implementation scope.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood80/100

Technical, low-controversy reauthorization with modest funding increase and collaborative provisions fits patterns of bills that clear Congress.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Whether authorized funds will be appropriated by appropriations committees
  • Exact annual appropriation period and fiscal scoring absent from text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Left/center emphasize science, safety, and funding increases.

Technical, low-controversy reauthorization with modest funding increase and collaborative provisions fits patterns of bills that clear Cong…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-targeted administrative/operational amendment that clearly integrates into the existing statute, enumerates modernization items, establishes governance elem…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis