S. 1087 (119th)Bill Overview

Rebuild America’s Health Care Schools Act of 2025

Health|Administrative law and regulatory proceduresDepartment of Health and Human Services
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 14, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill amends Medicare hospital cost rules to allow hospitals to include a wider set of direct and indirect costs for approved nursing and allied health education programs when reporting reasonable costs.

It defines related entities whose allocated costs may be included, requires HHS rulemaking within 120 days, prohibits Medicare recoupment for costs that would be allowable under the amendment, and requires refunds of certain recouped amounts from the prior six years.

Passage45/100

Relatively narrow, technical provider reimbursement change with identifiable fiscal impact; plausible bipartisan support but not guaranteed without offsets or package vehicle.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly drafted substantive amendment to Medicare cost rules that specifies new categories of allowable direct and indirect costs for hospital-affiliated nursing and allied health education programs and defines related entities; it also prescribes a short rulemaking timeline and a prohibition on recoupment with a limited refund requirement.

Contention65/100

Liberal emphasizes workforce and access benefits; conservatives emphasize fiscal cost and abuse risk.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
WorkersFederal agencies
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncreases Medicare reimbursement for hospital-incurred education costs, improving financial support for training progra…
  • Targeted stakeholdersEncourages hospitals and health systems to expand or sustain nursing and allied health education programs.
  • WorkersSupports clinical training capacity, potentially increasing the supply of nurses and allied health workers.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesLikely increases Medicare spending, exerting additional pressure on federal outlays and trust fund finances.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay advantage large integrated health systems that can allocate related-entity costs over smaller independent hospitals.
  • Targeted stakeholdersCreates risk of aggressive cost-shifting or improper allocations by related entities, raising fraud and abuse concerns.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes workforce and access benefits; conservatives emphasize fiscal cost and abuse risk.
Progressive85%

Likely supportive; views the bill as a federal investment to rebuild clinical training pipelines and shore up nursing and allied health workforce capacity.

Supporters will see it as directing Medicare dollars to strengthen public and community-serving hospitals and expand training opportunities, especially in underserved areas.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Generally favorable but cautious.

Sees practical benefits for workforce development and hospital finances, while seeking clear fiscal estimates and guardrails to prevent gaming and control Medicare costs.

Split reaction
Conservative25%

Skeptical; prioritizes fiscal restraint and limited federal expansion.

Concerns center on greater Medicare spending, federal micromanagement, and opportunities for abuse via related-entity cost allocations.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Relatively narrow, technical provider reimbursement change with identifiable fiscal impact; plausible bipartisan support but not guaranteed without offsets or package vehicle.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Magnitude of additional Medicare spending caused by the change
  • Administrative details HHS will set in rulemaking
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes workforce and access benefits; conservatives emphasize fiscal cost and abuse risk.

Relatively narrow, technical provider reimbursement change with identifiable fiscal impact; plausible bipartisan support but not guaranteed…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly drafted substantive amendment to Medicare cost rules that specifies new categories of allowable direct and indirect costs for hospital-affiliated nursing…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis