S. 1118 (119th)Bill Overview

Water Intelligence, Security, and Cyber Threat Protection Act of 2025

Water Resources Development|Water Resources Development
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Mar 25, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Environment and Public Works.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill directs the EPA to create a program, within one year of enactment, to boost participation in the Water Information Sharing and Analysis Center (Water ISAC).

The program must offset membership costs for community water systems and treatment works, expand EPA cooperation with Water ISAC on incident data collection and analysis, and enhance Water ISAC tools for monitoring and preparedness against malevolent acts and natural hazards.

It authorizes $10 million for each of fiscal years 2026 and 2027, available until expended.

Passage45/100

Modest, narrowly scoped, noncontroversial program with limited cost increases chances, but committee and scheduling barriers reduce near-term odds.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a narrowly scoped administrative program within EPA, sets a clear high-level purpose, and authorizes two years of funding, but it provides limited operational detail and omits safeguards and accountability mechanisms.

Contention50/100

Progressives stress equity and longer-term funding needs

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies · States
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncreases information sharing among water utilities, potentially improving threat detection and incident response times.
  • Targeted stakeholdersOffsets membership costs, lowering financial barriers for small and resource-limited water systems.
  • Federal agenciesEnhances EPA coordination with the Water ISAC, improving federal situational awareness of sector risks.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersTwo-year authorization may leave insufficient long-term funding for sustained Water ISAC support.
  • Federal agenciesRaises federal spending by $20 million, which critics may view as an added budgetary commitment.
  • StatesInformation sharing requirements could raise legal, privacy, or liability concerns for utilities and states.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives stress equity and longer-term funding needs
Progressive85%

Likely broadly supportive because the bill strengthens public water system resilience and incident intelligence.

Would push for stronger equity, environmental justice, and long-term funding commitments.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Generally favorable to improved information sharing and modest federal support, but cautious about duplication, measurable outcomes, and short-term funding.

Will seek clear metrics and interagency coordination.

Leans supportive
Conservative35%

Cautious to skeptical: supports water security goals in principle but worried about federal expansion, data centralization, and recurring costs.

More comfortable if participation remains voluntary and protections limit federal overreach.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Modest, narrowly scoped, noncontroversial program with limited cost increases chances, but committee and scheduling barriers reduce near-term odds.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Whether appropriators will fund the authorized amounts
  • Committee action timing and priority on the bill
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives stress equity and longer-term funding needs

Modest, narrowly scoped, noncontroversial program with limited cost increases chances, but committee and scheduling barriers reduce near-te…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a narrowly scoped administrative program within EPA, sets a clear high-level purpose, and authorizes two years of funding, but it provides limited operati…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis