Read twice and referred to the Committee on Agriculture, Nutrition, and Forestry.
The Food Secure Strikers Act of 2025 amends Section 6(d) of the Food and Nutrition Act of 2008 to prevent workers and their households from being made ineligible for SNAP solely because a household member is on strike.
The bill removes existing statutory language that disqualifies struck workers from participating in the supplemental nutrition assistance program while on strike.
Modest, targeted proposal with limited fiscal impact but politically linked to labor; passage more likely if attached to larger bill.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly states a narrow substantive policy objective and identifies the statutory section to be amended, but the operative amendment language provided is fragmented and ambiguous and lacks implementation detail, fiscal acknowledgment, edge-case treatment, and accountability measures.
Progressives emphasize anti-hunger and labor-rights benefits.
Progressives emphasize anti-hunger and labor-rights benefits.
Sees the bill as a targeted pro-worker, anti-hunger measure that protects basic food access during labor disputes.
Views removing strike-based SNAP disqualifications as consistent with protecting low-income households and labor rights.
Likely sympathetic to preventing food insecurity during strikes but concerned about program integrity and fiscal impacts.
Wants narrowly tailored language, verification, and oversight to limit unintended incentives.
Views the bill as expanding entitlement access in a way that could encourage strikes and increase federal expenditures.
Prefers preserving disincentives to strikes and limiting federal intervention in labor disputes.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Modest, targeted proposal with limited fiscal impact but politically linked to labor; passage more likely if attached to larger bill.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize anti-hunger and labor-rights benefits.
Modest, targeted proposal with limited fiscal impact but politically linked to labor; passage more likely if attached to larger bill.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill clearly states a narrow substantive policy objective and identifies the statutory section to be amended, but the operative amendment language provided is fragmented a…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.