S. 1158 (119th)Bill Overview

Working Families Flexibility Act of 2025

Labor and Employment|Administrative remediesCivil actions and liability
Sponsor
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Mar 26, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

Creates a private-sector compensatory time (comp time) option in place of monetary overtime pay under the FLSA.

Employers may offer comp time through collective bargaining or voluntary written agreement for employees with at least 1,000 hours in prior 12 months.

Limits accrual to 160 hours, requires annual cash-out of unused time, allows cash-out of hours over 80 with notice, prohibits coercion, provides remedies for violations, requires DOL notice updates, mandates GAO reporting, and sunsets after five years.

Passage30/100

Narrow but ideologically charged labor change with stakeholder opposition likely; sunset and safeguards help but major hurdles remain.

CredibilityAligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly drafted substantive revision to the Fair Labor Standards Act that specifies operational mechanics, implementation responsibilities, enforcement remedies, and reporting requirements. It integrates cleanly with existing statutory provisions and includes a sunset and GAO evaluation schedule.

Contention65/100

Progressives emphasize wage erosion; conservatives emphasize flexibility and choice.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Workers · FamiliesWorkers · Employers
Likely helped
  • WorkersProvides workers an option to bank paid time off instead of receiving cash overtime.
  • FamiliesGives some employees increased flexibility to address family or personal scheduling needs.
  • EmployersAllows employers to reduce immediate cash payroll outlays by substituting time off for overtime pay.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersNonunion employees might face subtle pressure to accept comp time despite anti-coercion safeguards.
  • WorkersWorkers who have not worked 1,000 hours in the prior year are ineligible, excluding many part-time staff.
  • EmployersEmployers could delay cash payouts or manipulate scheduling, creating enforcement and litigation risks.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize wage erosion; conservatives emphasize flexibility and choice.
Progressive20%

Likely skeptical or opposed.

While framed as flexibility, the bill risks weakening mandatory overtime pay and pressuring lower-paid workers.

The 1,000-hour threshold, employer discontinuation ability, and administrative gaps raise fairness concerns despite GAO reporting and a sunset.

Likely resistant
Centrist55%

Mixed but cautiously open.

The bill offers voluntary flexibility and respects unions, with monitoring and a sunset that permit evaluation.

Concerns focus on enforcement, recordkeeping, and exclusion of many workers; would favor clearer rules and DOL guidance.

Split reaction
Conservative85%

Generally supportive.

The bill expands private-sector flexibility, permits voluntary agreements, and limits government intrusion.

The sunset and reporting make it a measured pilot.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Narrow but ideologically charged labor change with stakeholder opposition likely; sunset and safeguards help but major hurdles remain.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
52%
Complexitymedium
Why this could stall
  • Level of organized-labor opposition or employer association support
  • Committee amendments that could broaden or narrow scope
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize wage erosion; conservatives emphasize flexibility and choice.

Narrow but ideologically charged labor change with stakeholder opposition likely; sunset and safeguards help but major hurdles remain.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a clearly drafted substantive revision to the Fair Labor Standards Act that specifies operational mechanics, implementation responsibilities, enforcement remedies,…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis