S. 1177 (119th)Bill Overview

Volunteer Driver Tax Appreciation Act of 2025

Taxation|Taxation
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Mar 27, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Finance.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

This bill (Volunteer Driver Tax Appreciation Act of 2025) amends Internal Revenue Code section 170 to change the mileage rate used for charitable deductions.

It retains a 14-cent-per-mile floor generally, but for transportation of persons or property on behalf of certain charities a rate set by the Treasury Secretary must be no less than the standard business (sections 162 and 212) mileage rate.

The change applies to taxable years beginning after December 31, 2024.

Passage45/100

Small, administrable change with modest fiscal impact increases plausibility; success depends on bundling with larger tax/omnibus legislation or agreement on offsets.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped statutory amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly identifies the targeted provision and provides an effective date, but it contains drafting irregularities, delegates a critical determination to the Secretary without procedural detail, and omits fiscal and oversight provisions.

Contention52/100

Liberals stress nonprofit and access benefits; conservatives stress fiscal cost.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersFederal agencies · Taxpayers
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersIncreases per-mile tax deduction or reimbursement for volunteer drivers transporting people or property.
  • Targeted stakeholdersReduces out-of-pocket travel costs for volunteers, potentially making volunteering more affordable.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay improve nonprofit service delivery and volunteer retention by raising reimbursements.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesIncreases federal revenue losses through larger charitable mileage deductions.
  • TaxpayersPrimarily benefits taxpayers who itemize, potentially creating distributional inequities.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay encourage additional driving, raising vehicle emissions and related externalities.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals stress nonprofit and access benefits; conservatives stress fiscal cost.
Progressive80%

Likely supportive because the bill increases support for volunteer drivers and nonprofits that serve vulnerable people.

They will welcome higher reimbursements that can help sustain volunteer-delivered services, while noting the bill relies on tax deductions rather than direct funding.

Leans supportive
Centrist65%

Cautiously favorable but pragmatic; sees a modest, targeted policy to help volunteers and charities.

Would seek a clear estimate of revenue impact and implementation details to prevent abuse and ensure efficient targeting.

Split reaction
Conservative35%

Skeptical because it expands a tax expenditure and increases federal revenue loss.

Some conservatives may appreciate supporting volunteerism, but many will object to enlarging deductions without offsets.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Small, administrable change with modest fiscal impact increases plausibility; success depends on bundling with larger tax/omnibus legislation or agreement on offsets.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Estimated revenue impact absent from text
  • Whether offsets or pay-for will be required
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals stress nonprofit and access benefits; conservatives stress fiscal cost.

Small, administrable change with modest fiscal impact increases plausibility; success depends on bundling with larger tax/omnibus legislati…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly scoped statutory amendment to the Internal Revenue Code that clearly identifies the targeted provision and provides an effective date, but it contains d…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis