S. 1239 (119th)Bill Overview

Convenient Contraception Act

Health|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 1, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief

The Convenient Contraception Act amends the Public Health Service Act to require group and individual health plans to allow enrollees to obtain up to a 365-day supply of contraceptives in a single fill or refill without cost-sharing.

The rule applies to plan years beginning on or after January 1, 2026.

HHS, Labor, and Treasury must begin outreach within 90 days of enactment to inform providers and enrollees about the change.

Passage45/100

Technocratic, modest-impact bill that improves access to contraception but occupies a politically sensitive policy area with potential legal and ideological resistance.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory amendment that clearly creates a new coverage entitlement and situates the requirement within the Public Health Service Act with an effective date and a short outreach mandate. It provides a clear single-sentence operational rule (up to 365-day supply, single fill/refill, no cost-sharing) but leaves many implementation, fiscal, enforcement, and edge-case details to implementing agencies or future rulemaking.

Contention65/100

Liberal emphasizes access and equity benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Who this appears to help vs burden50% / 50%
Targeted stakeholdersTargeted stakeholders
Likely helped
  • Targeted stakeholdersExpands patient access by allowing a yearlong contraceptive supply in a single fill, reducing pharmacy visits.
  • Targeted stakeholdersLikely improves contraceptive adherence and continuity of care, potentially lowering unintended pregnancy rates.
  • Targeted stakeholdersReduces out-of-pocket costs for enrollees because covered contraceptive supplies are provided without cost-sharing.
Likely burdened
  • Targeted stakeholdersCould increase short-term insurer or plan costs and affect premium calculations or cash flow.
  • Targeted stakeholdersMay create pharmacy inventory, dispensing, and storage challenges when issuing yearlong supplies.
  • Targeted stakeholdersRaises potential for unused medication waste if patients discontinue or change methods during the year.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberal emphasizes access and equity benefits
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive because the bill expands contraceptive access, reduces cost barriers, and increases reproductive autonomy.

Supporters will view the single-fill 365-day option as evidence-based convenience that improves adherence and equity.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally supportive of expanded access but cautious about costs, administrative implementation, and legal risks.

Wants clear guidance, cost estimates, and monitoring to ensure effective rollout without unintended consequences.

Leans supportive
Conservative20%

Likely opposed because the bill imposes a federal insurance coverage mandate and could raise costs or conflict with employer and pharmacy conscience protections.

Skeptical of federal expansion into private insurance choices.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood45/100

Technocratic, modest-impact bill that improves access to contraception but occupies a politically sensitive policy area with potential legal and ideological resistance.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Potential litigation or exemptions based on religious objections
  • No cost estimate or CBO score included
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberal emphasizes access and equity benefits

Technocratic, modest-impact bill that improves access to contraception but occupies a politically sensitive policy area with potential lega…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a focused statutory amendment that clearly creates a new coverage entitlement and situates the requirement within the Public Health Service Act with an effective d…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis