Read twice and referred to the Committee on Rules and Administration.
This bill repeals Executive Order 14248 (Preserving and Protecting the Integrity of American Elections) and prohibits federal funds from being used to implement that order.
It bars federal funding for the Department of Government Efficiency to access state voter registration lists, voter list maintenance records, federal immigration databases, or other records related to federal elections.
The bill cites the Constitution, the National Voter Registration Act, and the Help America Vote Act in its findings.
Narrow and administratively simple but high political stakes and no compromise features reduce prospects; likely to encounter strong resistance and possible executive veto.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions primarily as a substantive policy change that nullifies a named Executive Order and creates categorical prohibitions on Federal funding for specified activities. The purpose and principal prohibitions are stated clearly, but the statute provides limited operational detail, lacks definitions for key terms and actors, contains no fiscal analysis, and offers no accountability or enforcement provisions.
Progressives emphasize voter protection and preventing disenfranchisement
Progressives emphasize voter protection and preventing disenfranchisement
This persona would view the bill as a needed rollback of executive overreach that risked disenfranchising voters.
They see it as protecting longstanding statutory voter safeguards and state authority over elections.
A centrist would generally support reasserting Congress and state roles over elections and object to apparent executive overreach.
However, they would want narrow language and safeguards to preserve legitimate fraud investigations and operational assistance.
A mainstream conservative would likely oppose the bill as it curtails federal tools intended to protect election integrity.
They'd see the repeal as removing mechanisms to verify voter rolls and detect unlawful voting.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow and administratively simple but high political stakes and no compromise features reduce prospects; likely to encounter strong resistance and possible executive veto.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize voter protection and preventing disenfranchisement
Narrow and administratively simple but high political stakes and no compromise features reduce prospects; likely to encounter strong resist…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill functions primarily as a substantive policy change that nullifies a named Executive Order and creates categorical prohibitions on Federal funding for specified activi…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.