S. 1257 (119th)Bill Overview

A bill to amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to authorize the use of funds for certain additional Carey Act projects, and for other purposes.

Water Resources Development|Water Resources Development
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 2, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to allow certain IIJA funds (section 40901(2)(B)) to be used to rehabilitate, reconstruct, or replace dams built under the Carey Act (Act of August 18, 1894). The Secretary may only use those amounts after making two affirmative determinations: that targeted Carey Act dams have the necessary funding to complete the work under this subsection, and that the IIJA funds remain available.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize environmental, tribal, and ecosystem safeguards

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill performs a focused statutory amendment that clearly integrates into the existing IIJA framework and specifies the funding source and eligible activities.

This bill amends the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to allow certain IIJA funds (section 40901(2)(B)) to be used to rehabilitate, reconstruct, or replace dams built under the Carey Act (Act of August 18, 1894).

The Secretary may only use those amounts after making two affirmative determinations: that targeted Carey Act dams have the necessary funding to complete the work under this subsection, and that the IIJA funds remain available.

Passage40/100

Targeted, administrative change with low controversy but depends on budget trade-offs and committee prioritization.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill performs a focused statutory amendment that clearly integrates into the existing IIJA framework and specifies the funding source and eligible activities. It leaves important implementation and accountability details to the administering Secretary and contains minimal fiscal exposition.

Contention25/100

Liberals emphasize environmental, tribal, and ecosystem safeguards

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesStates

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesIncreases federal funding availability for rehabilitating aging Carey Act dams, improving structural safety.
  • Potential benefitSupports construction, engineering, and related short-term jobs from dam rehabilitation and replacement projects.
  • Potential benefitCan improve irrigation reliability and water storage for agricultural users served by those dams.
Likely burdened
  • StatesCould be viewed as subsidizing dams that primarily benefit private irrigators or state water interests.
  • Potential burdenMay divert limited IIJA funds from other competing infrastructure priorities and projects.
  • Potential burdenRehabilitation activities can temporarily harm aquatic habitat and complicate fish passage unless mitigated.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize environmental, tribal, and ecosystem safeguards
Progressive70%

Likely cautiously supportive of repairing aging water infrastructure and preventing dam failures, paired with environmental and equity concerns.

Would want assurances about environmental review, tribal consultation, and that upgrades don't enable harmful projects.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Pragmatic support if the measure focuses on safety and is fiscally constrained.

Will weigh project prioritization, oversight, and clear criteria for Secretary determinations before endorsing widespread use of funds.

Leans supportive
Conservative80%

Generally favorable toward repairing dams that support agriculture and local water use, provided federal action is limited and respects state/local roles.

Might still seek protections against expanding federal obligations.

Leans supportive
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

Targeted, administrative change with low controversy but depends on budget trade-offs and committee prioritization.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No explicit cost or CBO estimate included
  • Number and scale of eligible Carey Act dams unclear
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize environmental, tribal, and ecosystem safeguards

Targeted, administrative change with low controversy but depends on budget trade-offs and committee prioritization.

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill performs a focused statutory amendment that clearly integrates into the existing IIJA framework and specifies the funding source and eligible activities. It leaves im…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis