- Federal agenciesIncreases federal funding availability for rehabilitating aging Carey Act dams, improving structural safety.
- Potential benefitSupports construction, engineering, and related short-term jobs from dam rehabilitation and replacement projects.
- Potential benefitCan improve irrigation reliability and water storage for agricultural users served by those dams.
A bill to amend the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to authorize the use of funds for certain additional Carey Act projects, and for other purposes.
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
This bill amends the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to allow certain IIJA funds (section 40901(2)(B)) to be used to rehabilitate, reconstruct, or replace dams built under the Carey Act (Act of August 18, 1894). The Secretary may only use those amounts after making two affirmative determinations: that targeted Carey Act dams have the necessary funding to complete the work under this subsection, and that the IIJA funds remain available.
Liberals emphasize environmental, tribal, and ecosystem safeguards
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill performs a focused statutory amendment that clearly integrates into the existing IIJA framework and specifies the funding source and eligible activities.
This bill amends the Infrastructure Investment and Jobs Act to allow certain IIJA funds (section 40901(2)(B)) to be used to rehabilitate, reconstruct, or replace dams built under the Carey Act (Act of August 18, 1894).
The Secretary may only use those amounts after making two affirmative determinations: that targeted Carey Act dams have the necessary funding to complete the work under this subsection, and that the IIJA funds remain available.
Targeted, administrative change with low controversy but depends on budget trade-offs and committee prioritization.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill performs a focused statutory amendment that clearly integrates into the existing IIJA framework and specifies the funding source and eligible activities. It leaves important implementation and accountability details to the administering Secretary and contains minimal fiscal exposition.
Liberals emphasize environmental, tribal, and ecosystem safeguards
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
- StatesCould be viewed as subsidizing dams that primarily benefit private irrigators or state water interests.
- Potential burdenMay divert limited IIJA funds from other competing infrastructure priorities and projects.
- Potential burdenRehabilitation activities can temporarily harm aquatic habitat and complicate fish passage unless mitigated.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Liberals emphasize environmental, tribal, and ecosystem safeguards
Likely cautiously supportive of repairing aging water infrastructure and preventing dam failures, paired with environmental and equity concerns.
Would want assurances about environmental review, tribal consultation, and that upgrades don't enable harmful projects.
Pragmatic support if the measure focuses on safety and is fiscally constrained.
Will weigh project prioritization, oversight, and clear criteria for Secretary determinations before endorsing widespread use of funds.
Generally favorable toward repairing dams that support agriculture and local water use, provided federal action is limited and respects state/local roles.
Might still seek protections against expanding federal obligations.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Targeted, administrative change with low controversy but depends on budget trade-offs and committee prioritization.
- No explicit cost or CBO estimate included
- Number and scale of eligible Carey Act dams unclear
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Liberals emphasize environmental, tribal, and ecosystem safeguards
Targeted, administrative change with low controversy but depends on budget trade-offs and committee prioritization.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill performs a focused statutory amendment that clearly integrates into the existing IIJA framework and specifies the funding source and eligible activities. It leaves im…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.