S. 1276 (119th)Bill Overview

American Innovation Act

Science, Technology, Communications|Science, Technology, Communications
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 3, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions. (text: CR S2174-2175: 1)

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The American Innovation Act authorizes multi-year increases in appropriations for basic science at NSF, DOE Office of Science, DOD science and technology programs, NIST research, and NASA’s Science Mission Directorate from FY2026 through FY2035, with CPI-based indexing beginning FY2036. Funds remain available until expended; the bill exempts these appropriations from sequestration and excludes their budgetary effects from certain PAYGO scorecards.

Why people may split

Support for large science investment versus concern over fiscal cost

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified appropriation/authorization measure: it sets explicit annual funding levels for major science accounts, specifies availability, and integrates those appropriations into existing budget law (including sequestration and PAYGO treatment).

The American Innovation Act authorizes multi-year increases in appropriations for basic science at NSF, DOE Office of Science, DOD science and technology programs, NIST research, and NASA’s Science Mission Directorate from FY2026 through FY2035, with CPI-based indexing beginning FY2036.

Funds remain available until expended; the bill exempts these appropriations from sequestration and excludes their budgetary effects from certain PAYGO scorecards.

It defines covered accounts and makes the funding trajectories explicit by fiscal year.

Passage35/100

Targets popular policy area (research) but very large, uncapped long-term spending and exemptions from sequestration/PAYGO make enactment uncertain without offsets or major negotiation.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified appropriation/authorization measure: it sets explicit annual funding levels for major science accounts, specifies availability, and integrates those appropriations into existing budget law (including sequestration and PAYGO treatment).

Contention68/100

Support for large science investment versus concern over fiscal cost

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agenciesFederal agencies

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesIncreased federal R&D funding strengthens research capacity across universities, national labs, and industry partnershi…
  • Potential benefitPredictable multi-year funding with CPI adjustments provides stability for long-term research planning and projects.
  • Potential benefitGrants and contracts likely expand academic, national lab, and contractor employment and could create or sustain thousa…
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesAuthorized appropriations increase federal outlays and are likely to raise deficits absent offsetting savings.
  • Potential burdenExcluding these amounts from PAYGO scorecards reduces transparency and weakens statutory deficit accounting.
  • Potential burdenSequestration exemption decreases discretionary flexibility to cut spending during fiscal emergencies or deficit reduct…
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Support for large science investment versus concern over fiscal cost
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive of sustained, substantial increases in federal basic research funding to boost science, climate, and equitable economic opportunity.

May press for clearer language prioritizing climate, public-good research, workforce diversity, and distribution to universities and minority-serving institutions.

Concerned about the bill’s defense-heavy allocation and fiscal carve-outs (sequestration/PAYGO exemption) unless paired with equity and transparency safeguards.

Leans supportive
Centrist70%

Supportive of predictable, multi-year funding for core science agencies, viewing it as a pragmatic investment in competitiveness.

Cautious about the bill’s budgetary treatment — exemptions from PAYGO and sequestration — and would seek performance metrics, oversight, and possible offsets or phased implementation to manage fiscal tradeoffs.

Leans supportive
Conservative30%

Skeptical of significant, long-term federal spending increases and the removal of standard fiscal constraints.

May welcome targeted defense science increases for national security, but objects to broad civilian R&D spending, PAYGO and sequestration exemptions, and CPI-indexed perpetual growth without offsets or sunset provisions.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood35/100

Targets popular policy area (research) but very large, uncapped long-term spending and exemptions from sequestration/PAYGO make enactment uncertain without offsets or major negotiation.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Absence of CBO cost estimate and score
  • Whether offsets or payfors will be proposed
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Support for large science investment versus concern over fiscal cost

Targets popular policy area (research) but very large, uncapped long-term spending and exemptions from sequestration/PAYGO make enactment u…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified appropriation/authorization measure: it sets explicit annual funding levels for major science accounts, specifies availability, and integrates tho…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis