Read twice and referred to the Committee on Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs.
The bill directs the Treasury to mint commemorative $5 gold and $1 silver coins for the 25th anniversary of the September 11, 2001 attacks, with specified metal content, inscriptions, and design review.
Sales include surcharges ($35 for gold, $10 for silver) payable to the National September 11 Memorial and Museum for operations, subject to audit, and require that minting be cost-neutral to the federal government.
Coins are to be issued in proof and uncirculated qualities during calendar year 2027, with design consultations and limits tied to existing commemorative-program caps.
Low controversy, limited fiscal impact, self-funded structure, common legislative precedent for commemorative coins.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive law authorizing a limited commemorative coin program. It provides detailed technical specifications, financial mechanics (including surcharge amounts and cost-recovery requirements), and explicit integration with existing title 31 provisions. It assigns clear responsibility to the Secretary of the Treasury and anticipates key fiscal and programmatic constraints.
Concern over commercialization versus respectful commemoration
Concern over commercialization versus respectful commemoration
Likely supportive as a commemorative measure that raises funds for the 9/11 Memorial and Museum and honors victims and responders.
Would emphasize the need for transparent use of surcharge funds and that proceeds support survivors, families, and public education rather than commercialization.
Generally favorable but pragmatic: supports honoring 9/11 and funding the museum so long as the program remains cost-neutral and well-audited.
Will look for assurances that issuance limits, administrative costs, and surcharge transfers are managed efficiently.
Likely supportive of a patriotic commemoration that includes mandated inscriptions like 'In God We Trust' and is structured to be cost-neutral.
May be mildly skeptical of federal involvement but accepts the buyer-funded model and the memorial funding purpose.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Low controversy, limited fiscal impact, self-funded structure, common legislative precedent for commemorative coins.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Concern over commercialization versus respectful commemoration
Low controversy, limited fiscal impact, self-funded structure, common legislative precedent for commemorative coins.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a well-specified substantive law authorizing a limited commemorative coin program. It provides detailed technical specifications, financial mechanics (including su…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.