Read twice and referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.
Reauthorizes the Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) grant program for fiscal years 2026–2030, adds statutory definitions for "crime analyst" and "law enforcement assistant," expands allowable uses of grant funds to hire analysts, pay overtime, buy technology, and support multi‑jurisdictional task forces, and requires an annual Attorney General report on local spending, community outreach, and violent crime counts in each PSN area.
Liberals alarmed by tech and overtime expansions; conservatives see stronger enforcement tools.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory reauthorization and amendment of an existing grant program: it integrates cleanly into the existing statutory framework and specifies several concrete amendments (definitions, allowable uses, extension of authorization period, and an annual reporting requirement).
Reauthorizes the Project Safe Neighborhoods (PSN) grant program for fiscal years 2026–2030, adds statutory definitions for "crime analyst" and "law enforcement assistant," expands allowable uses of grant funds to hire analysts, pay overtime, buy technology, and support multi‑jurisdictional task forces, and requires an annual Attorney General report on local spending, community outreach, and violent crime counts in each PSN area.
Focused reauthorization of an established grant program with modest expansions typically secures enactment, though unspecified funding levels and privacy concerns reduce certainty.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory reauthorization and amendment of an existing grant program: it integrates cleanly into the existing statutory framework and specifies several concrete amendments (definitions, allowable uses, extension of authorization period, and an annual reporting requirement).
Liberals alarmed by tech and overtime expansions; conservatives see stronger enforcement tools.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals alarmed by tech and overtime expansions; conservatives see stronger enforcement tools.
Sees benefit in community engagement and analyst hiring but worries the bill expands policing capacity without clear civil‑liberties safeguards.
Supports transparency requirement but finds oversight provisions limited and surveillance risks unaddressed.
Views the bill as a pragmatic reauthorization to retain a long‑standing federal grant tool; welcomes analytics, task force support, and reporting, while seeking clearer cost controls and outcome measures.
Favors reauthorization and expanded tools for law enforcement to reduce violent crime; supportive of funding for overtime, analysts, technology, and task forces to improve public safety.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Focused reauthorization of an established grant program with modest expansions typically secures enactment, though unspecified funding levels and privacy concerns reduce certainty.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals alarmed by tech and overtime expansions; conservatives see stronger enforcement tools.
Focused reauthorization of an established grant program with modest expansions typically secures enactment, though unspecified funding leve…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a straightforward statutory reauthorization and amendment of an existing grant program: it integrates cleanly into the existing statutory framework and specifies s…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.