Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
The bill withdraws specified Federal land within the Pecos Watershed in New Mexico from mineral entry and leasing, as depicted on an official map. It designates about 11,599 acres of Forest Service land as the Thompson Peak Wilderness Area, adds that area to the National Wilderness Preservation System, and requires the Secretary of Agriculture to file maps and legal descriptions.
Liberals emphasize watershed and habitat protections.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise substantive land- use statute that properly integrates with the Wilderness Act and related land/mineral law, specifies the land to be withdrawn via referenced maps, preserves existing rights, and provides basic administrative steps for implementation.
The bill withdraws specified Federal land within the Pecos Watershed in New Mexico from mineral entry and leasing, as depicted on an official map.
It designates about 11,599 acres of Forest Service land as the Thompson Peak Wilderness Area, adds that area to the National Wilderness Preservation System, and requires the Secretary of Agriculture to file maps and legal descriptions.
The bill preserves valid existing rights, allows pre-existing grazing to continue, and authorizes the Secretary to take measures for wildfire, insect, and disease control.
A narrow, administrable land-protection bill with compromise features gives it modest chances, but localized opposition and separate mineral interests create meaningful obstacles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise substantive land- use statute that properly integrates with the Wilderness Act and related land/mineral law, specifies the land to be withdrawn via referenced maps, preserves existing rights, and provides basic administrative steps for implementation.
Liberals emphasize watershed and habitat protections.
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize watershed and habitat protections.
Broadly supportive: this protects watersheds, wildlife habitat, and expands wilderness.
The grazing continuation and wildfire authority align with pragmatic conservation.
They may seek stronger language on tribal consultation and climate-resilience actions.
Cautiously favorable if local stakeholders largely back it.
Values the predictable legal status and resource protection but wants clarity on economic impact and process.
Would look for assurances on valid existing rights and clear mapping.
Likely skeptical or opposed due to federal withdrawal of land from mineral development and expanded federal control.
Sees potential economic and property-rights costs, and prefers state or local primacy.
May accept limited conservation if offsets granted.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
A narrow, administrable land-protection bill with compromise features gives it modest chances, but localized opposition and separate mineral interests create meaningful obstacles.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize watershed and habitat protections.
A narrow, administrable land-protection bill with compromise features gives it modest chances, but localized opposition and separate minera…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise substantive land- use statute that properly integrates with the Wilderness Act and related land/mineral law, specifies the land to be withdrawn via refer…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.