S. 1321 (119th)Bill Overview

Moab UMTRA Project Transition Act of 2025

Energy|EnergyLand transfers
Cosponsors
Support
Republican
Introduced
Apr 8, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill amends a provision of the Strom Thurmond NDAA to allow the Department of Energy to convey the Moab UMTRA site, at no cost, to Grand County, Utah, once remedial action completion is sufficient for land transfer as determined by the Secretary of Energy in consultation with regulators. The conveyance is subject to regulatory or use restrictions needed to protect health and safety (including UMTRCA and 40 C.F.R. part 192 requirements), retention by the United States of necessary water rights for ongoing remediation, a prohibition on Grand County reconveying conveyed land to private or nonprofit entities, and any additional terms the Secretary of Energy deems necessary to protect U.S. interests.

Why people may split

Liberals stress environmental safeguards and enforceable cleanup benchmarks

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, narrowly scoped substantive policy change (transfer of the Moab UMTRA site to Grand County) and integrates that change with existing environmental statutes and regulatory authorities, but it provides limited operational and fiscal detail.

This bill amends a provision of the Strom Thurmond NDAA to allow the Department of Energy to convey the Moab UMTRA site, at no cost, to Grand County, Utah, once remedial action completion is sufficient for land transfer as determined by the Secretary of Energy in consultation with regulators.

The conveyance is subject to regulatory or use restrictions needed to protect health and safety (including UMTRCA and 40 C.F.R. part 192 requirements), retention by the United States of necessary water rights for ongoing remediation, a prohibition on Grand County reconveying conveyed land to private or nonprofit entities, and any additional terms the Secretary of Energy deems necessary to protect U.S. interests.

Passage40/100

A narrow, site-specific conveyance with built-in conditions has moderate chance, but environmental/regulatory objections and procedural Senate hurdles reduce likelihood.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, narrowly scoped substantive policy change (transfer of the Moab UMTRA site to Grand County) and integrates that change with existing environmental statutes and regulatory authorities, but it provides limited operational and fiscal detail.

Contention35/100

Liberals stress environmental safeguards and enforceable cleanup benchmarks

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Local governments · Federal agenciesCounties · Local governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Local governmentsTransfers site management to local government, increasing local control over land use decisions.
  • Local governmentsPotential for local economic development and tourism from reuse of remediated land.
  • Federal agenciesReduces ongoing federal property management and administrative responsibilities for DOE.
Likely burdened
  • Potential burdenProhibition on reconveyance restricts private investment and public‑private redevelopment options.
  • CountiesGrand County may inherit maintenance, security, and administrative costs after transfer.
  • Local governmentsRetained water rights and regulatory restrictions could constrain local land use and development.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals stress environmental safeguards and enforceable cleanup benchmarks
Progressive70%

A liberal observer would view the bill cautiously positive if it ensures cleanup and long-term environmental protections.

They will focus on whether the transfer occurs only after verifiable remediation and whether retained federal rights are sufficient to protect groundwater and public health.

Leans supportive
Centrist80%

A centrist would see this as pragmatic: returning land to local hands once remediation is sufficient, while preserving federal safeguards.

Their assessment will hinge on clear, objective transfer triggers, enforceable protections, and clarity about liability and continuing remediation responsibilities.

Leans supportive
Conservative55%

A conservative observer will generally favor returning federal land to local control but may object to federal retention of water rights and the ban on reconveyance to private entities.

They will also be attentive to any federal regulatory restrictions that limit county authority or economic opportunity.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood40/100

A narrow, site-specific conveyance with built-in conditions has moderate chance, but environmental/regulatory objections and procedural Senate hurdles reduce likelihood.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • Current remediation completion status and timeline
  • Absent formal cost or liability estimates in text
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals stress environmental safeguards and enforceable cleanup benchmarks

A narrow, site-specific conveyance with built-in conditions has moderate chance, but environmental/regulatory objections and procedural Sen…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear, narrowly scoped substantive policy change (transfer of the Moab UMTRA site to Grand County) and integrates that change with existing environmenta…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis