- Targeted stakeholdersMaintains uninterrupted government-private cybersecurity information sharing through 2035.
- Targeted stakeholdersImproves threat detection by preserving established channels for sharing technical indicators.
- Targeted stakeholdersReduces compliance uncertainty and administrative burden for companies relying on the program.
Cybersecurity Information Sharing Extension Act
Read twice and referred to the Committee on Homeland Security and Governmental Affairs.
This bill amends section 111(a) of the Cybersecurity Act of 2015 (6 U.S.C. 1510(a)) by extending its effective period.
The date currently set to expire in 2025 would be replaced with 2035.
No other changes to statutory text are included in this bill.
Very narrow, low-cost extension of an existing authority with limited policy change; procedural and privacy objections are the main risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, narrowly framed procedural (housekeeping) amendment that replaces the statutory effective date in 6 U.S.C. 1510(a) to extend the period of the underlying cybersecurity information-sharing provision.
Privacy oversight vs operational continuity: liberals emphasize safeguards; conservatives prioritize continuity
Who stands to gain, and who may push back.
- Targeted stakeholdersExtends duration of sharing authorities that critics say may increase privacy and personal data exposure.
- Targeted stakeholdersContinues liability protections that some argue reduce legal accountability for improper data disclosures.
- Targeted stakeholdersDelays legislative review and reform that could tighten privacy safeguards or oversight mechanisms.
Why the argument around this bill splits.
Privacy oversight vs operational continuity: liberals emphasize safeguards; conservatives prioritize continuity
Cautiously supportive of maintaining public-private cybersecurity information sharing, but concerned about civil liberties and privacy.
Wants stronger transparency, minimization, and oversight provisions before fully endorsing a ten-year extension.
Pragmatic support if the extension prevents a lapse in operational authorities and is paired with oversight and performance metrics.
Views this as an administrative update but wants measurable accountability.
Likely favorable because it sustains information-sharing tools that bolster national security and reduce regulatory friction.
Prefers minimal new constraints or federal expansion alongside the extension.
The path through Congress.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very narrow, low-cost extension of an existing authority with limited policy change; procedural and privacy objections are the main risks.
- Whether privacy advocates will mount sustained opposition
- Committee and floor scheduling/prioritization
Recent votes on the bill.
No vote history yet
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Go deeper than the headline read.
Privacy oversight vs operational continuity: liberals emphasize safeguards; conservatives prioritize continuity
Very narrow, low-cost extension of an existing authority with limited policy change; procedural and privacy objections are the main risks.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a concise, narrowly framed procedural (housekeeping) amendment that replaces the statutory effective date in 6 U.S.C. 1510(a) to extend the period of the underlyin…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.