S. 1338 (119th)Bill Overview

Ending PUSHOUT Act of 2025

Education|Education
Cosponsors
Support
Democratic
Introduced
Apr 8, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

The bill strengthens federal data collection and reporting on exclusionary school discipline and funds competitive grants to reduce suspensions, expulsions, restraints, and other exclusionary practices. Grants require schools to adopt restorative, trauma-informed, and culturally sustaining approaches, prohibit certain punishments (corporal punishment, seclusion, many restraints), and bar use of grant funds to hire school-based law enforcement or purchase surveillance.

Why people may split

Progressives emphasize civil-rights, anti-punitive, mental health benefits.

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy-change vehicle that combines statutory data collection mandates, a competitively awarded grant program with programmatic prohibitions and required practices, and a study/reccomendation task force.

The bill strengthens federal data collection and reporting on exclusionary school discipline and funds competitive grants to reduce suspensions, expulsions, restraints, and other exclusionary practices.

Grants require schools to adopt restorative, trauma-informed, and culturally sustaining approaches, prohibit certain punishments (corporal punishment, seclusion, many restraints), and bar use of grant funds to hire school-based law enforcement or purchase surveillance.

It establishes a joint task force focused on ending pushout of girls of color and authorizes $500 million annually for grants and task force activities and $500 million annually for civil rights data collection.

Passage30/100

Ambitious, costly, and ideologically salient program with controversial restrictions (SROs, surveillance, ICE partnerships); passage likely requires compromise or appropriation trade-offs.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy-change vehicle that combines statutory data collection mandates, a competitively awarded grant program with programmatic prohibitions and required practices, and a study/reccomendation task force. It is generally explicit about definitions, responsible agencies, reporting timelines, and grant program conditions.

Contention72/100

Progressives emphasize civil-rights, anti-punitive, mental health benefits.

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
Federal agencies · WorkersSchools · Local governments

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Federal agenciesExpanded federal data collection enables identification and public reporting of disciplinary disparities across student…
  • WorkersGrants fund hiring of counselors, social workers, and trauma-informed staff, potentially increasing school mental healt…
  • StudentsProhibitions on many exclusionary practices likely reduce suspensions, expulsions, and lost instructional time for targ…
Likely burdened
  • SchoolsExpanded reporting and compliance obligations increase administrative burden and data responsibilities for districts an…
  • Local governmentsRestrictions on disciplinary options may constrain local responses to certain serious behavioral or safety incidents.
  • Local governmentsMandates and funding priorities could create tensions with state and local authority over school discipline policies.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Progressives emphasize civil-rights, anti-punitive, mental health benefits.
Progressive95%

Likely strongly supportive: the bill targets racial and disability disparities, limits harmful practices, and funds trauma-informed alternatives.

It aligns with priorities on civil rights, ending corporal punishment, and expanding mental health supports in schools.

Leans supportive
Centrist60%

Cautiously supportive but pragmatic: values data and alternatives to exclusionary discipline, while concerned about costs, operational details, and unintended safety tradeoffs.

Wants phased implementation, clear metrics, and protections for school safety.

Split reaction
Conservative20%

Likely opposed: views the bill as federal overreach into local school discipline and school safety, particularly restricting law enforcement presence and limiting disciplinary tools for misbehavior.

Concerns about costs and undermining teacher authority.

Likely resistant
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood30/100

Ambitious, costly, and ideologically salient program with controversial restrictions (SROs, surveillance, ICE partnerships); passage likely requires compromise or appropriation trade-offs.

Scope and complexity
52%
Scopemoderate
86%
Complexityhigh
Why this could stall
  • No Congressional Budget Office cost estimate included in text
  • Extent of bipartisan support among education and law-enforcement stakeholders
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Progressives emphasize civil-rights, anti-punitive, mental health benefits.

Ambitious, costly, and ideologically salient program with controversial restrictions (SROs, surveillance, ICE partnerships); passage likely…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a substantive policy-change vehicle that combines statutory data collection mandates, a competitively awarded grant program with programmatic prohibitions and requ…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis