Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
This bill amends the Family and Medical Leave Act to prohibit employers from recovering employer-paid health insurance premiums when an employee does not return to work because of the birth of their child. It also requires employers to notify eligible employees taking leave for childbirth that the employer may not recoup those premiums in that circumstance.
Liberals emphasize parental protection and reduced financial penalties
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment to the FMLA that is drafted as direct statutory text changes and a simple notice duty.
This bill amends the Family and Medical Leave Act to prohibit employers from recovering employer-paid health insurance premiums when an employee does not return to work because of the birth of their child.
It also requires employers to notify eligible employees taking leave for childbirth that the employer may not recoup those premiums in that circumstance.
Narrow administrative change with modest private-sector cost; plausible bipartisan support but subject to employer pushback and Senate procedure.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment to the FMLA that is drafted as direct statutory text changes and a simple notice duty. The bill specifies where in the U.S. Code the change should be made and uses concise language to accomplish its objective.
Liberals emphasize parental protection and reduced financial penalties
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Liberals emphasize parental protection and reduced financial penalties
Likely views the bill positively as a targeted protection that removes a financial penalty for new parents who stay home after birth.
Sees it as improving family leave fairness and reducing a deterrent to bonding leave.
Views the bill as a modest, administratively simple fix to clarify FMLA exceptions and notice obligations.
Appreciates narrow scope but wants clarity about definitions and small-employer impacts.
Likely views the bill skeptically as an unnecessary restriction on employers' ability to recoup costs and an added regulatory burden.
Prefers employer remedies and limited federal mandates.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Narrow administrative change with modest private-sector cost; plausible bipartisan support but subject to employer pushback and Senate procedure.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Liberals emphasize parental protection and reduced financial penalties
Narrow administrative change with modest private-sector cost; plausible bipartisan support but subject to employer pushback and Senate proc…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill is a narrowly focused substantive amendment to the FMLA that is drafted as direct statutory text changes and a simple notice duty. The bill specifies where in the U.S…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.