Read twice and referred to the Committee on Energy and Natural Resources.
The bill amends the Theodore Roosevelt National Park statute to require the Secretary of the Interior to maintain a genetically diverse herd of horses in the Park’s South Unit, with at least 150 animals. It directs the Secretary to produce a management plan within 120 days, prohibits removal of horses except under narrow conditions, and requires annual monitoring and public reporting on herd population, structure, and health.
Progressives emphasize animal protection and transparency benefits
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory obligation to maintain a genetically diverse herd of at least 150 horses in the South Unit of Theodore Roosevelt National Park, assigns responsibility to the Secretary of the Interior, sets a short deadline for a management plan, and requires annual public monitoring.
The bill amends the Theodore Roosevelt National Park statute to require the Secretary of the Interior to maintain a genetically diverse herd of horses in the Park’s South Unit, with at least 150 animals.
It directs the Secretary to produce a management plan within 120 days, prohibits removal of horses except under narrow conditions, and requires annual monitoring and public reporting on herd population, structure, and health.
Very narrow, administratively focused change with limited ideological content; modest fiscal implications lower but not eliminate hurdles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory obligation to maintain a genetically diverse herd of at least 150 horses in the South Unit of Theodore Roosevelt National Park, assigns responsibility to the Secretary of the Interior, sets a short deadline for a management plan, and requires annual public monitoring. However, it omits important implementation elements (definitions and measurement of "genetically diverse," procedures for achieving/maintaining genetics and population targets, funding or budgetary authority, and explicit reconciliation with other federal authorities), so the statutory duty is specified but not fully operationalized.
Progressives emphasize animal protection and transparency benefits
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Progressives emphasize animal protection and transparency benefits
Likely cautiously supportive because the bill protects animals and mandates transparency.
Support hinges on strong ecological safeguards and funding to prevent harm to park ecosystems and wildlife.
Generally supportive of preserving a cultural/natural resource but concerned about implementation details, costs, and ecological tradeoffs.
Will look for a clear, evidence-based management plan and cost estimate before full backing.
Likely skeptical because the bill mandates federal preservation actions and a rigid minimum herd size.
Concerns focus on federal overreach, cost, and limits on management flexibility.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Very narrow, administratively focused change with limited ideological content; modest fiscal implications lower but not eliminate hurdles.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Progressives emphasize animal protection and transparency benefits
Very narrow, administratively focused change with limited ideological content; modest fiscal implications lower but not eliminate hurdles.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear statutory obligation to maintain a genetically diverse herd of at least 150 horses in the South Unit of Theodore Roosevelt National Park, assigns…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.