Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.
Establishes a Title X Clinic Fund within HHS to expand funding for family planning clinics. Appropriates $512,000,000 annually for grants and contracts and $50,000,000 annually for clinic infrastructure for fiscal years 2026–2035.
Disagreement over federal spending scale versus public-health benefit
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a substantive funding program by creating a Title X Clinic Fund with multi‑year appropriations and basic conditions administered by the Office of the Secretary, but it provides only moderate operational detail and limited accountability provisions.
Establishes a Title X Clinic Fund within HHS to expand funding for family planning clinics.
Appropriates $512,000,000 annually for grants and contracts and $50,000,000 annually for clinic infrastructure for fiscal years 2026–2035.
Funds remain available until expended.
Focused funding bill with clear mechanics but high ideological salience (pregnancy termination counseling) and sizable multi-year spending reduce its standalone viability.
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a substantive funding program by creating a Title X Clinic Fund with multi‑year appropriations and basic conditions administered by the Office of the Secretary, but it provides only moderate operational detail and limited accountability provisions.
Disagreement over federal spending scale versus public-health benefit
These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.
Disagreement over federal spending scale versus public-health benefit
Likely strongly supportive because the bill increases long-term funding and infrastructure for family planning and requires nondirective counseling that includes information about termination.
They may flag implementation risks around who receives subawards and insist on protections ensuring comprehensive contraceptive and reproductive-care access.
Generally favorable to increased access and targeted infrastructure investments but cautious about fiscal oversight and implementation details.
Will want accountability, measurable outcomes, and protections against misuse of funds or unintended contractual mandates.
Likely opposed or skeptical because the bill creates large recurring federal spending and contains counseling rules and contract protections that may compel participation by organizations with conflicting beliefs.
Concerned about federal expansion into local health services and potential indirect support for abortion-related counseling.
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Reached or meaningfully advanced
Still ahead
Still ahead
Still ahead
Focused funding bill with clear mechanics but high ideological salience (pregnancy termination counseling) and sizable multi-year spending reduce its standalone viability.
The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.
Disagreement over federal spending scale versus public-health benefit
Focused funding bill with clear mechanics but high ideological salience (pregnancy termination counseling) and sizable multi-year spending…
Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a substantive funding program by creating a Title X Clinic Fund with multi‑year appropriations and basic conditions administered by the Office of the Secr…
Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.