S. 1409 (119th)Bill Overview

Public Safety Officer Concussion and Traumatic Brain Injury Health Act of 2025

Health|Health
Cosponsors
Support
Bipartisan
Introduced
Apr 10, 2025
Discussions
Bill Text
Current stageCommittee

Read twice and referred to the Committee on Health, Education, Labor, and Pensions.

Introduced
Committee
Floor
President
Law
Congressional Activities
01 · The brief
Plain-English summaryWhat this bill actually does

This bill requires the HHS Secretary, through CDC, to collect and publish information on concussion and traumatic brain injury (TBI) among public safety officers. It directs CDC to update its TBI website, consult stakeholders, disseminate information to clinicians, employers, mental health providers, patients, and researchers, and it authorizes grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements to develop model guidelines, protocols, and evidence-based practices.

Why people may split

Liberals emphasize expanded worker health and mental-health benefits

Watch point

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear administrative mandate for HHS/CDC to collect and disseminate information on concussion and traumatic brain injury among public safety officers, with stakeholder consultation and authority to support related activities.

This bill requires the HHS Secretary, through CDC, to collect and publish information on concussion and traumatic brain injury (TBI) among public safety officers.

It directs CDC to update its TBI website, consult stakeholders, disseminate information to clinicians, employers, mental health providers, patients, and researchers, and it authorizes grants, contracts, and cooperative agreements to develop model guidelines, protocols, and evidence-based practices.

The statute defines "public safety officer" by reference to existing law.

Passage70/100

Low controversy, technical focus, and limited fiscal burden make enactment plausible, though funding and floor scheduling could delay or block progress.

CredibilityPartially aligned

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear administrative mandate for HHS/CDC to collect and disseminate information on concussion and traumatic brain injury among public safety officers, with stakeholder consultation and authority to support related activities.

Contention30/100

Liberals emphasize expanded worker health and mental-health benefits

02 · What it does

Who stands to gain, and who may push back.

Likely benefits vs burdens50% / 50%
EmployersFederal agencies · States

These are examples from the analysis, not a ranked list of the most-affected groups.

Likely helped
  • Potential benefitImproved centralized access to CDC information on concussion and TBI for public safety stakeholders.
  • Potential benefitSupports development and dissemination of evidence-based treatment and prevention practices.
  • EmployersEnhances training resources for clinicians, mental health providers, and employer health programs.
Likely burdened
  • Federal agenciesRequires federal staffing and administrative costs without an explicit appropriation.
  • StatesCould duplicate or overlap existing CDC TBI surveillance and state programs.
  • Potential burdenData collection activities could raise privacy and confidentiality concerns for individual officers.
03 · Why people split

Why the argument around this bill splits.

Liberals emphasize expanded worker health and mental-health benefits
Progressive90%

Likely supportive because the bill targets occupational health, mental health links, and evidence-based protections for first responders.

It aligns with priorities to reduce workplace injury and improve healthcare access for public safety personnel.

Leans supportive
Centrist75%

Generally favorable but pragmatic: supports better data and guidance for public safety health while seeking clarity on costs, overlap with existing CDC programs, and measurable outcomes.

Wants efficient, accountable implementation.

Leans supportive
Conservative60%

Cautiously supportive of improving first-responder safety, but wary of expanding federal activities and unfunded mandates.

Preference for information-only approaches over regulatory or costly programs.

Split reaction
04 · Can it pass?

The path through Congress.

Introduced

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Committee

Reached or meaningfully advanced

Floor

Still ahead

President

Still ahead

Law

Still ahead

Passage likelihood70/100

Low controversy, technical focus, and limited fiscal burden make enactment plausible, though funding and floor scheduling could delay or block progress.

Scope and complexity
24%
Scopenarrow
24%
Complexitylow
Why this could stall
  • No explicit appropriation or cost estimate included
  • Potential overlap with existing CDC TBI activities
05 · Recent votes

Recent votes on the bill.

No vote history yet

The bill has not accumulated any surfaced votes yet.

06 · Go deeper

Go deeper than the headline read.

Included on this page

Liberals emphasize expanded worker health and mental-health benefits

Low controversy, technical focus, and limited fiscal burden make enactment plausible, though funding and floor scheduling could delay or bl…

Unlocked analysis

Relative to its intended legislative type, this bill establishes a clear administrative mandate for HHS/CDC to collect and disseminate information on concussion and traumatic brain injury among public safety officers, w…

Go beyond the headline summary with full stakeholder mapping, legislative design analysis, passage barriers, and lens-by-lens tradeoff breakdowns.

Perspective breakdownsPassage barriersLegislative design reviewStakeholder impact map
Open full analysis